From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.208.211 with SMTP id h202csp1654045lfg; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:00:17 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.55.212.1 with SMTP id l1mr14583004qki.93.1456225217490; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:00:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g51si22462574qge.96.2016.02.23.03.00.17 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:00:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYAhV-0002o4-23 for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:00:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57225) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYAe8-0005ZN-Es for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:56:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYAe5-0002YR-Nk for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:56:48 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYAe5-0002YN-I7; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:56:45 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B58D155DE; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (vpn1-6-142.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.142]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id u1NAudnW018362; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:56:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:56:39 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Gerd Hoffmann Message-ID: <20160223125604-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1455906029-25565-1-git-send-email-somlo@cmu.edu> <20160222133015.6eece98e@nial.brq.redhat.com> <1456217512.29896.78.camel@redhat.com> <20160223104839.5a51df9a@nial.brq.redhat.com> <1456223945.29896.89.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456223945.29896.89.camel@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, stefanha@gmail.com, "Gabriel L. Somlo" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org, luto@amacapital.net, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov , lersek@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/5] add ACPI node for fw_cfg on pc and arm X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org X-TUID: yKZj8AvZfwT/ On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Di, 2016-02-23 at 10:48 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:51:52 +0100 > > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > > > On Mo, 2016-02-22 at 13:30 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:20:24 -0500 > > > > "Gabriel L. Somlo" wrote: > > > > > > > > Gerd, > > > > > > > > if you are going to apply it, you'll need to update > > > > expected tables for acpi test (rebuild-expected-aml.sh) > > > > as a commit on top of this series. > > > > > > Sure? > > > > > > Applied the series, ran "make check", no errors. > > it's a warning so far not a hard error but it's still there. > > Checked again, no warning printed here ... > > Also "git diff" doesn't list any changes after running the rebuild > script. > > But when booting a live iso I can see the new QEMU0002 device listed > in /proc/ioports. > > Any clues what is going on here? > > cheers, > Gerd I'll look into this Thursday when I get to this. -- MST