From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 2002:a19:e348:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id c8csp3196885lfk; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhHGfJ2pqkbtmCLN749ih096SMHuKr8LLMa40hsMEQllve4X1zmOUKFiXkd0H4hXN4fqxJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1083:b0:633:d1f:2e01 with SMTP id v3-20020a056902108300b006330d1f2e01mr20841479ybu.222.1650466612298; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1650466612; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Es3F30ONwrDUP6MOHb5oP2TbzlarwFMFBksT/ENJ+onJF/8e3EiHdT+kuq1uUMhi87 wBj+1Jx6AILKl0MVLuoB+vpg8DhbQoqpeLe5pJkuwXaT73vEZfH0P/D1VTFQtgY+5Ysf SJOXGz4m3vsYYUv+56Vl+zu74HmQTDc6BdUr1BXzVUXwBQtWNxZoNH8W/la5vtxNhrg7 Z9tlObPJL8jHapK5/8TiDeX4rbPj6Ga1iPPhdXIpNtvB0Q3f97Gz+4DspSHSphWlLKEy 47CBhTbqjTg8gwI97qjZD2KdjmWIv9XZ1d5AY+XU3ufSydgMndQX3kruJazeRKVnUpxJ yGYQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:cc:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=1aTLpHUw8vkZhTRWzG2wbOiVVKGvJcRxmcqgduknEtQ=; b=Q8QcvFSrhqgNvuqonTIKBpvZAFKR/kgvgg8xzkKo1hf4rPUC9DRWhRUZC9AvIzcUPO TtnJeHZpJaskPhOPpJZgF5ZZN9xgXtMHwJjxKIKnLT+FN6Z1u4vZGKljVfrOMXzIcPSp /l2rPJZFncY1O4j1WwTLivyxcFs6EZwdqIm9hsLfWi2bIha26LPUtXj5W/Z4z9S1VpvZ EH0tPT6xqJ2aF3+vf9Ib8f3sit4HmXZY9X6NpsJJY3gfZ3ZIHnGb2+O1K3PBM0jtQEsa MUjDqHZL0FFvSZBZxRuSvbTGPHLGv2PfsYOYTU0puqwQsgabRX6eys2AsQ2E+UlpnYYS oILg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ou7aktXZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [209.51.188.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j85-20020a815558000000b002ef61de812asi25703ywb.460.2022.04.20.07.56.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ou7aktXZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from localhost ([::1]:59046 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhBlD-0005kA-Jv for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:56:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhBfZ-0001dP-V5 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:51:02 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:56851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhBfV-0001f1-Tv for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:50:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1650466257; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1aTLpHUw8vkZhTRWzG2wbOiVVKGvJcRxmcqgduknEtQ=; b=Ou7aktXZ2aFpDsLmI9i89iGNAK+7endnTxqZ0SeElxpmMiXWgiO6AE+dhDW8yDI6xo98gr CUhM9ggtf6AYLSVThd3tU7VP5uj9mVSG1RYS0eybQEKjx6Km4fF7QZTp6DOqdzTd8mi1Bz /R21H1qpWKe/zaCU52Jqd5XBE0xgt/c= Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-202-jW_iAbEiOnecUfEJ-luHrw-1; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:50:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jW_iAbEiOnecUfEJ-luHrw-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id s28-20020a05640217dc00b0041d69ecc528so1341167edy.12 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1aTLpHUw8vkZhTRWzG2wbOiVVKGvJcRxmcqgduknEtQ=; b=lUbIAjRTgcc6osQqpeM7KjJgrkP/Hw9DZbOXWK1I2KMulKjoPP9cZvDewCE+PESP9m OKkj9KvBdco7cWCaXecLUpTrGhetYXwl22QbppVoeYRcbAQSs4GgY6QCrwLLumKbGOix AyI6LtLe6lM93Z+30dCq90uax18fJbLPctEdjwX9Ud4jy0f4OIDTbYpidfJjC2nP/oIW kq/n79s00fX98NMtDXWV11Y2l1jsLvZQI/ldCYwzGsG6QJV9J11qQH1cWzw6kry9uo84 h42Rp2mdsTP3C1u647EnGaAysQIvBo1XFXKJcDpdk4VzlOTYQP2SQvUhcGsIDVJsOHuL 1Iow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zyOewwtrZfZ41UsQe1tlj2Q/BqPs5LABu7DOnE8W0AqKDBSSX I+rXLZ8sRdhX2oGu3yfHw64RAqzQ7MTQwxQ54ErHUA1jHes0VxKGq5orixXh1JDPqnK1K386tYg hnP5md7fGNeJS X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6e89:b0:6e8:d79a:dced with SMTP id sh9-20020a1709076e8900b006e8d79adcedmr18951101ejc.563.1650466252592; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:50:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6e89:b0:6e8:d79a:dced with SMTP id sh9-20020a1709076e8900b006e8d79adcedmr18951052ejc.563.1650466252234; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com. [213.175.37.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7-20020a17090665c700b006efb9a33ca5sm3113754ejn.164.2022.04.20.07.50.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:50:50 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov To: Gavin Shan Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] hw/arm/virt: Consider SMP configuration in CPU topology Message-ID: <20220420165050.66dd87a7@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <7f7ead25-a050-1e86-132a-a3e1e9b1e3b1@redhat.com> References: <20220418020920.144263-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20220418020920.144263-3-gshan@redhat.com> <20220420103248.6e3575cd@redhat.com> <20220420135032.43711096@redhat.com> <7f7ead25-a050-1e86-132a-a3e1e9b1e3b1@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=imammedo@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=imammedo@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: eduardo@habkost.net, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, f4bug@amsat.org, wangyanan55@huawei.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, ani@anisinha.ca, pbonzini@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: uJbL4bV3OSpU On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:24:46 +0800 Gavin Shan wrote: > Hi Igor, > > On 4/20/22 7:50 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 18:31:02 +0800 > > Gavin Shan wrote: > >> On 4/20/22 4:32 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > >>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:09:18 +0800 > >>> Gavin Shan wrote: > >>> > >>>> Currently, the SMP configuration isn't considered when the CPU > >>>> topology is populated. In this case, it's impossible to provide > >>>> the default CPU-to-NUMA mapping or association based on the socket > >>>> ID of the given CPU. > >>>> > >>>> This takes account of SMP configuration when the CPU topology > >>>> is populated. The die ID for the given CPU isn't assigned since > >>>> it's not supported on arm/virt machine. Besides, the used SMP > >>>> configuration in qtest/numa-test/aarch64_numa_cpu() is corrcted > >>>> to avoid testing failure > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan > >>>> Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang > >>>> --- > >>>> hw/arm/virt.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > >>>> tests/qtest/numa-test.c | 3 ++- > >>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > >>>> index d2e5ecd234..5443ecae92 100644 > >>>> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > >>>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > >>>> @@ -2505,6 +2505,7 @@ static const CPUArchIdList *virt_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms) > >>>> int n; > >>>> unsigned int max_cpus = ms->smp.max_cpus; > >>>> VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms); > >>>> + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(vms); > >>>> > >>>> if (ms->possible_cpus) { > >>>> assert(ms->possible_cpus->len == max_cpus); > >>>> @@ -2518,8 +2519,20 @@ static const CPUArchIdList *virt_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms) > >>>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].type = ms->cpu_type; > >>>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].arch_id = > >>>> virt_cpu_mp_affinity(vms, n); > >>>> + > >>>> + assert(!mc->smp_props.dies_supported); > >>>> + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.has_socket_id = true; > >>>> + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.socket_id = > >>>> + (n / (ms->smp.clusters * ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.threads)); > >>>> + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.has_cluster_id = true; > >>>> + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.cluster_id = > >>>> + (n / (ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.threads)) % ms->smp.clusters; > >>>> + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.has_core_id = true; > >>>> + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.core_id = > >>>> + (n / ms->smp.threads) % ms->smp.cores; > >>>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.has_thread_id = true; > >>>> - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.thread_id = n; > >>>> + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[n].props.thread_id = > >>>> + n % ms->smp.threads; > >>>> } > >>>> return ms->possible_cpus; > >>>> } > >>>> diff --git a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c > >>>> index 90bf68a5b3..aeda8c774c 100644 > >>>> --- a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c > >>>> +++ b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c > >>>> @@ -223,7 +223,8 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data) > >>>> QTestState *qts; > >>>> g_autofree char *cli = NULL; > >>>> > >>>> - cli = make_cli(data, "-machine smp.cpus=2 " > >>>> + cli = make_cli(data, "-machine " > >>>> + "smp.cpus=2,smp.sockets=1,smp.clusters=1,smp.cores=1,smp.threads=2 " > >>> > >>> Is cluster-less config possible? > >>> (looks like it used to work before and it doesn't after this series) > >>> > >> > >> Nope, it's impossible. This specific test case uses arm/virt machine > >> where cluster is always supported.mc->smp_props.clusters_supported > >> has been set to true in hw/arm/virt.c::virt_machine_class_init(). > >> > >> Exactly, the changes to virt_possible_cpu_arch_ids() included in this patch breaks > >> the test. It's why the fix to qtest/numa-test has been squashed to this patch, to > >> make it 'bit bisect' friendly as Yanan suggested. > > > > so what was error that broke the test? > > (probably should be mentioned in commit message) > > > > (also is it possible to split out the test patch into > > a separate one and put it before this one) > > > > With amend to the command lines, the following one is used and below error > is raised from the test. The error is mentioned in the commit log in > PATCH[v7 2/4]. > > -machine smp.cpus=2 \ > -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 \ > -numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 \ > -numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1 > > qemu-system-aarch64: -numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1: no match found > (reported from hw/core/machine.c::machine_set_cpu_numa_node()) > > After the changes to virt_possible_cpu_arch_ids() is applied, "thread-id=1" > isn't valid any more. The CPU topology becomes like below. Note that > mc->smp_props.prefer_sockets is true on arm/virt machine. > > index socket cluster core thread > -------------------------------------------- > 0 0 0 0 0 > 1 1 0 0 0 > > With the amended command lines, the topology changes again so > that "thread-id=1" is valid: > > index socket cluster core thread > -------------------------------------------- > 0 0 0 0 0 > 1 0 0 0 1 > > It should be ok to split the test/qtest/aarch64_numa_cpu() changes into > a separate patch and put it before this one. In that case, the specified > smp.{socket, cluster, core, threads} isn't used by arm/virt machine yet, > and 'thread-id=2' should be still valid. Lets do this if I need post v8. > Otherwise, I guess it's also fine to squash the test/qtest/aarch64_numa_cpu() > changes into PATCH[2/4], as we're doing. if you need to respin v7. do it as separate patch with proper commit message and maybe add an extra test that exercises fully specified topo. > > > > >> > >> > >>>> "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 " > >>>> "-numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 " > >>>> "-numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1"); > > Thanks, > Gavin >