From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
berrange@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] tests/functional: Re-activate the check-venv target
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:29:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e7f4c36-7bfa-4dcb-971b-cdc98ba92da2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66ea9c0e-14c6-465d-b473-2d750effff4c@redhat.com>
On 29/09/2025 08.26, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 26/09/2025 17.43, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>> Hi Thomas!
>>
>> On 9/26/25 05:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 26/09/2025 07.15, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>>> Add check-venv target as a dependency for the functional tests. This
>>>> causes Python modules listed in pythondeps.toml, under the testdeps
>>>> group, to be installed when 'make check-functional' is executed to
>>>> prepare and run the functional tests.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
>>>> Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tests/Makefile.include | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include
>>>> index 3538c0c740..d012a9b25d 100644
>>>> --- a/tests/Makefile.include
>>>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.include
>>>> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ $(FUNCTIONAL_TARGETS):
>>>> @$(MAKE) SPEED=thorough $(subst -functional,-func,$@)
>>>> .PHONY: check-functional
>>>> -check-functional:
>>>> +check-functional: check-venv
>>>
>>> I just noticed that there's still a problem: If you run "make check-
>>> functional-aarch64" immediately after configuring + compiling QEMU in a
>>> fresh folder for the first time, the functional tests fail with:
>>>
>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pygdbmi'
>>>
>>> We either need to add dependencies to the check-functional-<arch>
>>> targets, too, or we have to make sure that tests still get properly
>>> skipped in the case that pygdbmi has not been installed into the venv yet.
>>
>> Isn't it inconsistent that check-functional runs the test and
>> check-functional-<arch> doesn't? I think it's a good idea to
>> skip if the module is not available, yeah, I'll add it in v6,
>> but would it be ok to add check-venv to the check-functional-<arch>
>> targets too?
>
> I think so... so please try to change this patch to add the "check-venv"
> dependency to the "$(FUNCTIONAL_TARGETS):" line instead.
Looking at the code twice, I think you need it in addition, not "instead"
(since there is no direct dependency from check-functional to the
check-functional-<ARCH> targets).
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-26 5:15 [PATCH v4 0/9] tests/functional: Adapt reverse_debugging to run w/o Avocado Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] tests/functional: Re-activate the check-venv target Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 6:28 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 8:34 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 8:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-26 8:42 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 8:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-26 15:44 ` Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 15:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-26 16:02 ` Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 15:43 ` Gustavo Romero
2025-09-29 6:26 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-29 6:29 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] python: Install pygdbmi in meson's venv Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 6:28 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] tests/functional: Provide GDB to the functional tests Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 10:03 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 18:08 ` Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 18:15 ` Gustavo Romero
2025-09-29 6:34 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-29 8:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] tests/functional: Add GDB class Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 7:05 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] tests/functional: replace avocado process with subprocess Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 7:10 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] tests/functional: drop datadrainer class in reverse debugging Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 7:13 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] tests/functional: Add decorator to skip test on missing env vars Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 7:20 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] tests/functional: Adapt reverse_debugging to run w/o Avocado Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 8:44 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 16:00 ` Gustavo Romero
2025-09-29 6:24 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] tests/functional: Adapt arches to reverse_debugging " Gustavo Romero
2025-09-26 9:09 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 6:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] tests/functional: Adapt reverse_debugging to run " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-09-26 9:14 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 9:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-09-26 9:41 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-26 9:42 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e7f4c36-7bfa-4dcb-971b-cdc98ba92da2@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
--cc=manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).