From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.208.211 with SMTP id h202csp2762062lfg; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:40:43 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.37.6 with SMTP id q6mr3824592qgq.98.1457019643311; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:40:43 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b107si41468823qge.55.2016.03.03.07.40.43 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:40:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abVMo-0004BX-PQ for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:40:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abVMh-0004AR-7R for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:40:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abVMc-0002Pn-Ts for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:40:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abVMc-0002PU-OA; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:40:30 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1B864D29; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.61] (ovpn-112-61.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.61]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u23FeNlk005415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:40:26 -0500 To: Peter Maydell , Peter Crosthwaite References: From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56D85AE7.4060806@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:40:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:40:29 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Cc: Stefan Weil , QEMU Developers , Andrew Baumann , Alistair Francis , sridhar kulkarni , qemu-arm , =?UTF-8?Q?Piotr_Kr=c3=b3l?= Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 00/18] ARM big-endian and setend support X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org X-TUID: q0fSAsML5y8Z On 03/03/2016 16:25, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 2 March 2016 at 06:56, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> This patch series adds system-mode big-endian support for ARM. It also >> implements the setend instruction, and loading of BE binaries even in >> LE emulation mode. >> >> Based on Paolo's original work. >> >> I have tested all of LE, BE8 and BE32 in both linux-user mode (for >> regressions) and system mode (BE8 and BE32 are new here). >> My test application is here, the README gives some example command >> lines you can run: >> >> https://github.com/pcrost/arm-be-test >> >> Regards, >> Peter >> >> Changed since v1: >> Addressed PMM review >> Added doc comments to new/changed loader.h APIs > > Thanks for the respin. For the remaining patches: > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell > > Since there were only a couple of comment typos I'm planning to > apply this series to target-arm.next (and send a pullreq tomorrow > I expect). Yay, thanks Peter (both of you)! Paolo