From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.159.19 with SMTP id i19csp1409675lfe; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:58:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.55.77.202 with SMTP id a193mr34972730qkb.48.1454947120864; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 07:58:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a198si31045332qkb.68.2016.02.08.07.58.40 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 07:58:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org; dkim=fail header.i=@linaro.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoD2-000140-Fi for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoCW-0000bs-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoCV-0005c5-Kr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:08 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]:34891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoCV-0005bu-HB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:07 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e6so97782831vkh.2 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 07:58:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=xckAxQAnGkgXU/roCRd9qH94XRZ+WXvf1jnvSvYMAEI=; b=H6Np6RyRNvVLU88MngCNcUTcunbM4PlRCPhZlutV5DpNer7rwmt1CntCYwdKEW4AUm mcJa+wDCTIh8oQkk/zAaugkj/UKu6q0+KT2S4jv4d5QD1TysHZHall9kkRDY70sqB4Sf wDV6odXEzqAP9pWw4ktIN071YnbgC7hH+7BjY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=xckAxQAnGkgXU/roCRd9qH94XRZ+WXvf1jnvSvYMAEI=; b=HZX1cRqFRWjr2bTpVFOpA8BLKg+NN1LNX+YGUbdCJxVn6eQQcYERGrrWWcHlif04gY IkGkLCncjF7iJQw/hpm2yyHscFyTorq3b6AC+DQPi/HHYFIFozlfTWsJe6buxvKErHyW 4poBiqXw82R4DRD6kXp7MvZQIbVNGLQVCeqPyFKigijLLEc1M3MMhEFc6fYUHY2KNEaf X1HedV4v39W0PlXH/DWiH/VMwu6e+AdM8vi6IaRPL4YueZ+JWeGEPP47ECF9g7BwnHyn kWNiO+3y0TjaZLP5Ve5GMCLWpXo2p/2A4+gIeTdvrAzCm9bC+0c3kTSxvOCSE38aEPn2 Hrkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORIcZ/HBPLTR3RBjxh8sOMuX2QuDh/w+trEylaPC6t01PTKpqkuHf34z8tEGK/CWHppgErBudTpWPl3Ez8V X-Received: by 10.31.141.2 with SMTP id p2mr21031590vkd.37.1454947087089; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 07:58:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.56.216 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:57:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1454256948-10485-1-git-send-email-serge.fdrv@gmail.com> <1454256948-10485-2-git-send-email-serge.fdrv@gmail.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:57:47 +0000 Message-ID: To: Sergey Fedorov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d Cc: Peter Crosthwaite , QEMU Developers , qemu-arm , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] cpu: Add callback to check architectural watchpoint match X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org X-TUID: h36bteyAadEJ On 8 February 2016 at 15:42, Peter Maydell wrote: > Andreas -- can I nudge you to say your preferences on whether > QOM CPU methods should have wrapper functions, please? > I think this patchset is otherwise ready to apply. Andreas tells me on IRC that he doesn't insist on wrapper functions, so I think this patch is fine as is. thanks -- PMM