From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.21.156 with SMTP id 28csp1284251lfv; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.76.201 with SMTP id z192mr24051885qka.182.1469467172917; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c34si18482032qkh.144.2016.07.25.10.19.32 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@linaro.org; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33659 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRjXQ-0001BX-C0 for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:19:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRjXK-0001A6-RD for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:19:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRjXJ-0007Qd-Nl for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:19:26 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]:36406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRjXJ-0007QT-Jl for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:19:25 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n129so207241431vke.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:19:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0HTjdDFV7KPIYeQyYDFpMeingUuVDwRO7qhHLvZbabs=; b=FwZuRIpGNZdw2jYcZokD6CHp9D5/t2WYM4Hjc7Xpur8L+mdIQQivMlFFy0LjfxxVtP TYdFabdDDKlB0ZgVidbBDJ/HDpZiDQiB7I8z+61YTvDCXAYxlA3e+spHro1jsC72P5Ly 9zNSfLemqpO9+yO7t2HRQyLadR1dInr8WzgT4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0HTjdDFV7KPIYeQyYDFpMeingUuVDwRO7qhHLvZbabs=; b=itfeCPyrcVPJ/jf7k2jwKbB1g69Qf2YMWKeN9fNJsBlNt9sBRKZF9pPe7lHftOIVZT //ujgmAaZUUmW84UW6umV5ZJSoXiD7xjODWgUhbPx0BVNluU3RF/TiUXKdTGBxfQofaE 9BxleBSdL0aUY9xKoQ7BhuQAO6flmjVIPomyJRj/2xDuj8skqAVeFhg06edzlI0VIRr+ Qg8WvhyjbkyphurhP1D93urnz4klBYbCDq/klT0Anxm2beRIr3Dhl5XmYeeVp7LbYDow wppBPlXfaPysSIOqy1v4So8hj4kexBrbMJDsc9od/FzaRtk9IOiXXhZIUjR0k3ez/Py1 XzNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousCBvhm1JfcUqeGKEoGmWmCEytOn6mS+jo8p+t8pgN3C6rPlqWU/myAnUflC2Fo+Lq65MJsERrWZk3eCMwn X-Received: by 10.159.40.67 with SMTP id c61mr8946709uac.82.1469467165236; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:19:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.137.136 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1469466558-10964-1-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org> References: <1469466558-10964-1-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:19:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v3] ast2400: add a memory controller device model X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Jeffery , qemu-arm , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: kUh9rzHlbc11 On 25 July 2016 at 18:09, C=C3=A9dric Le Goater wrote: > The uboot in the previous release of the SDK was using a hardcoded > value for memory size. This is not true anymore, the value is now > retrieved from the memory controller. > > Below is a model for this device, only supporting unlock and > configuration. Without it, we endup running a guest with 64MB, which > is a bit low nowdays. It uses a 'silicon-rev' property and ram_size to > build a default value. Some bits should be linked to SCU strapping > registers but it seems a bit complex to add for the current need. > > The model is ready for the AST2500 SOC. > > Signed-off-by: C=C3=A9dric Le Goater > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Thanks. I have put this in my "for-next-release" mail folder so it ought to go out in a pull request once we've got 2.7 out. If it fails to show up please ping me to remind me to clear out that folder :-) -- PMM