From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.0.147 with SMTP id 141csp800721lfa; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:06:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.200.44.236 with SMTP id 41mr3788384qtx.267.1487959561830; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:06:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q15si6142526qtb.214.2017.02.24.10.06.01 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:06:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39030 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chKFj-0001Oy-5G for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:05:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chK4H-0007Ft-SG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:54:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chK4H-0007Ss-2x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:54:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chK4C-0007Ro-DN; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:54:04 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61EA27FB60; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-118-6.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.118.6] (may be forged)) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1OHs1Wl011193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:54:02 -0500 To: Peter Maydell , Vijay Kilari References: <1487850673-26455-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1487850673-26455-2-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:53:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:54:04 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 1/5] kernel: Add definitions for GICv3 attributes X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Marc Zyngier , Pavel Fedin , QEMU Developers , Vijaya Kumar K , qemu-arm , Christoffer Dall Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-TUID: ZG06uirU+akR Hi Peter, On 23/02/2017 19:35, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 February 2017 at 11:51, wrote: >> From: Vijaya Kumar K >> >> This temporary patch adds kernel API definitions. >> Use proper header update procedure after these features >> are released. > > I can't put this patchset into QEMU with this temporary patch; > you need to do a proper kernel headers update with > the update-linux-headers.sh script. With [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] update Linux headers to 4.11, Paolo fixed the update-linux-headers.sh (scripts/Makefile.headersinst:62: *** Missing generated UAPI file ./arch/arm/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd-common.h. and also updated the ARM headers so this patch is not needed anymore I think. This is not pulled yet though. I tested it on Cavium ThunderX without this first patch. Tested-by: Eric Auger Thanks Eric > > thanks > -- PMM >