From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
andre.przywara@arm.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
alex.bennee@linaro.org
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, wei@redhat.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/10] arm/arm64: smp: support more than 8 cpus
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 00:01:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e24e2ee1-634f-d7bb-2bdd-aa406e0d6032@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11a885eb-d43e-528e-235a-13358edc6ea6@redhat.com>
Hi Drew,
On 30/08/2016 16:28, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> Proper commit message?
> ... also selects the vgic model corresponding to the host
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arm/run | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>> arm/selftest.c | 5 ++++-
>> lib/arm/asm/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
>> lib/arm/asm/setup.h | 4 ++--
>> lib/arm/setup.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>> lib/arm64/asm/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
>> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arm/run b/arm/run
>> index a2f35ef6a7e63..2d0698619606e 100755
>> --- a/arm/run
>> +++ b/arm/run
>> @@ -31,13 +31,6 @@ if [ -z "$ACCEL" ]; then
>> fi
>> fi
>>
>> -if [ "$HOST" = "aarch64" ] && [ "$ACCEL" = "kvm" ]; then
>> - processor="host"
>> - if [ "$ARCH" = "arm" ]; then
>> - processor+=",aarch64=off"
>> - fi
>> -fi
>> -
>> qemu="${QEMU:-qemu-system-$ARCH_NAME}"
>> qpath=$(which $qemu 2>/dev/null)
>>
>> @@ -53,6 +46,18 @@ fi
>>
>> M='-machine virt'
>>
>> +if [ "$ACCEL" = "kvm" ]; then
>> + if $qemu $M,\? 2>&1 | grep gic-version > /dev/null; then
>> + M+=',gic-version=host'
>> + fi
>> + if [ "$HOST" = "aarch64" ]; then
>> + processor="host"
>> + if [ "$ARCH" = "arm" ]; then
>> + processor+=",aarch64=off"
>> + fi
>> + fi
>> +fi
>> +
>> if ! $qemu $M -device '?' 2>&1 | grep virtconsole > /dev/null; then
>> echo "$qpath doesn't support virtio-console for chr-testdev. Exiting."
>> exit 2
>> diff --git a/arm/selftest.c b/arm/selftest.c
>> index 196164f5313de..2f117f795d2dc 100644
>> --- a/arm/selftest.c
>> +++ b/arm/selftest.c
>> @@ -312,9 +312,10 @@ static bool psci_check(void)
>> static cpumask_t smp_reported;
>> static void cpu_report(void)
>> {
>> + unsigned long mpidr = get_mpidr();
>> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>
>> - report("CPU%d online", true, cpu);
>> + report("CPU(%3d) mpidr=%lx", mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) == cpu, cpu, mpidr);
>> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &smp_reported);
>> halt();
>> }
>> @@ -343,6 +344,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>
>> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "smp") == 0) {
>>
>> + unsigned long mpidr = get_mpidr();
>> int cpu;
>>
>> report("PSCI version", psci_check());
>> @@ -353,6 +355,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> smp_boot_secondary(cpu, cpu_report);
>> }
>>
>> + report("CPU(%3d) mpidr=%lx", mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) == 0, 0, mpidr);
>> cpumask_set_cpu(0, &smp_reported);
>> while (!cpumask_full(&smp_reported))
>> cpu_relax();
>> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/processor.h b/lib/arm/asm/processor.h
>> index f25e7eee3666c..d2048f5f5f7e6 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -40,8 +40,13 @@ static inline unsigned int get_mpidr(void)
>> return mpidr;
>> }
>>
>> -/* Only support Aff0 for now, up to 4 cpus */
>> -#define mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) ((int)((mpidr) & 0xff))
>> +#define MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK 0xffffff
>> +extern int mpidr_to_cpu(unsigned long mpidr);
>> +
>> +#define MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level) \
>> + (((1 << level) >> 1) << 3)
> can't we have level << 3?
Forget this, see below
>> +#define MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, level) \
>> + ((mpidr >> MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & 0xff)
>>
>> extern void start_usr(void (*func)(void *arg), void *arg, unsigned long sp_usr);
>> extern bool is_user(void);
>> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/setup.h b/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
>> index cb8fdbd38dd5d..c501c6ddd8657 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
>> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
>> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
>> #include <asm/page.h>
>> #include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
>>
>> -#define NR_CPUS 8
>> -extern u32 cpus[NR_CPUS];
>> +#define NR_CPUS 255
> 256?
>> +extern u64 cpus[NR_CPUS];
> maybe worth commenting the semantic of cpus[i]?
>> extern int nr_cpus;
> what about MAX_CPUS instead of NR_CPUS?
>>
>> #define NR_MEM_REGIONS 8
>> diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c
>> index 7e7b39f11dde1..b6e2d5815e723 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm/setup.c
>> +++ b/lib/arm/setup.c
>> @@ -24,12 +24,22 @@ extern unsigned long stacktop;
>> extern void io_init(void);
>> extern void setup_args_progname(const char *args);
>>
>> -u32 cpus[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = (~0U) };
>> +u64 cpus[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = (~0U) };
>> int nr_cpus;
>>
>> struct mem_region mem_regions[NR_MEM_REGIONS];
>> phys_addr_t __phys_offset, __phys_end;
>>
>> +int mpidr_to_cpu(unsigned long mpidr)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; ++i)
>> + if (cpus[i] == (mpidr & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK))
>> + return i;
>> + return -1;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void cpu_set(int fdtnode __unused, u32 regval, void *info __unused)
>> {
>> int cpu = nr_cpus++;
>> diff --git a/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h b/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h
>> index 9a208ff729b7e..7e448dc81a6aa 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -78,8 +78,13 @@ static inline type get_##reg(void) \
>>
>> DEFINE_GET_SYSREG64(mpidr)
>>
>> -/* Only support Aff0 for now, gicv2 only */
>> -#define mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) ((int)((mpidr) & 0xff))
>> +#define MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK 0xff00ffffff
>> +extern int mpidr_to_cpu(unsigned long mpidr);
>> +
>> +#define MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level) \
>> + (((1 << level) >> 1) << 3)
> what about level 3? the macro would fail fetching affinity level 3.
Forget that remark too. I read the magic behind in the patch's history.
Sorry for the noise.
Thanks
Eric
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>> +#define MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, level) \
>> + ((mpidr >> MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & 0xff)
>>
>> extern void start_usr(void (*func)(void *arg), void *arg, unsigned long sp_usr);
>> extern bool is_user(void);
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 13:00 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/10] arm/arm64: add gic framework Andrew Jones
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/10] lib: xstr: allow multiple args Andrew Jones
2016-08-30 14:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/10] arm64: fix get_"sysreg32" and make MPIDR 64bit Andrew Jones
2016-08-30 14:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/10] arm/arm64: smp: support more than 8 cpus Andrew Jones
2016-08-30 14:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-08-31 22:01 ` Auger Eric [this message]
2016-10-17 12:24 ` Andrew Jones
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/10] arm/arm64: add some delay routines Andrew Jones
2016-09-01 10:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/10] arm/arm64: irq enable/disable Andrew Jones
2016-09-01 10:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/10] arm/arm64: add initial gicv2 support Andrew Jones
2016-09-01 10:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-10-17 13:14 ` Andrew Jones
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/10] arm/arm64: add initial gicv3 support Andrew Jones
2016-09-01 10:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-10-17 13:30 ` Andrew Jones
2016-10-20 17:29 ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-21 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Jones
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/10] arm/arm64: gicv2: add an IPI test Andrew Jones
2016-09-01 16:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-10-17 19:15 ` Andrew Jones
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/10] arm/arm64: gicv3: " Andrew Jones
2016-09-01 16:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-10-17 13:36 ` Andrew Jones
2016-07-15 13:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/10] arm/arm64: gic: don't just use zero Andrew Jones
2016-09-02 9:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2016-10-17 19:53 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e24e2ee1-634f-d7bb-2bdd-aa406e0d6032@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).