From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmRRA-0002VK-6S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:01:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmRR3-0008Aa-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:01:04 -0500 Received: from indium.canonical.com ([91.189.90.7]:58665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmRR2-0008AP-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:00:57 -0500 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37]) by indium.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian)) id 1VmRR2-0003G5-95 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:00:56 +0000 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E8C2E8081 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:00:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 16:54:58 -0000 From: Gilcio Amaral Martins Sender: bounces@canonical.com References: <20120817150612.15201.15820.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> <20131127091644.14664.9258.malone@wampee.canonical.com> Message-Id: <-6784224695446414119@unknownmsgid> Errors-To: bounces@canonical.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1038136] Re: lack of keycode 89 for br-abnt2 keyboards Reply-To: Bug 1038136 <1038136@bugs.launchpad.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Thanks I will test it Gilcio Em 27/11/2013, =C3=A0s 07:25, rslemos escreveu: > I've managed to resolve it applying the following patch (without "-k pt- > br"): > > --- qemu-1.6.0+dfsg.orig/ui/x_keymap.c > +++ qemu-1.6.0+dfsg/ui/x_keymap.c > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static const uint8_t x_keycode_to_pc_key > */ > > static const uint8_t evdev_keycode_to_pc_keycode[61] =3D { > - 0, /* 97 EVDEV - RO ("Internet" Keyboards) */ > + 0x73, /* 97 EVDEV - /?=C2=B0 (ABNT2 Keyboards) */ > 0, /* 98 EVDEV - KATA (Katakana) */ > 0, /* 99 EVDEV - HIRA (Hiragana) */ > 0x79, /* 100 EVDEV - HENK (Henkan) */ > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038136 > > Title: > lack of keycode 89 for br-abnt2 keyboards > > Status in QEMU: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > qemu-kvm-1.1.1 > host system: slackware64-13.37 > Bug detailed description: > Independent of Guest OS nothing happens when keycode 89 is pressed. > If you select option "-k pt-br" at qemu commandline you get keycode 89 b= ut there is no more keycode 26 (dead_acute dead_grave) and keycode 51 fails= on "less" sign. > If you have a numeric keyboard you can use its "slash" key but there is = no means to use the question mark, causing discomfort when you are scriptin= g or programming. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1038136/+subscriptions -- = You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038136 Title: lack of keycode 89 for br-abnt2 keyboards Status in QEMU: Confirmed Bug description: qemu-kvm-1.1.1 host system: slackware64-13.37 Bug detailed description: Independent of Guest OS nothing happens when keycode 89 is pressed. = If you select option "-k pt-br" at qemu commandline you get keycode 89 bu= t there is no more keycode 26 (dead_acute dead_grave) and keycode 51 fails = on "less" sign. If you have a numeric keyboard you can use its "slash" key but there is n= o means to use the question mark, causing discomfort when you are scripting= or programming. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1038136/+subscriptions