qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jeebs" <Jeebs@yango.us>
To: Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:44:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000501c48eda$a026ab40$20649c3f@computername> (raw)

[I am *not* a developer, but since the user's list doesn't work, I lurk 
here.]

What is the development schedule for Qemu?

In other words, what priority is there for various things?

Fabrice's recent comment about vastly speeding up Qemu got me thinking that 
perhaps it might be better to work on other things first.

Don't misunderstand me... The recent discussion about performance 
improvements, and Fabrice's comments were *very* exciting.

But I was just thinking that before you do the exciting and the 'sexy' 
things, that perhaps you should work on the more mundane things needed to 
make Qemu into a highly usable product.

Like vastly improving the user interface.  Especially for Window's users 
(such as myself.)

Improving the basic virtual system to add things like full Pentium-3 
support.  MMX, SSE, cpuid, etc. etc.

Making sure the FPU behaves like it's supposed to.

Improving data transfers to/from the guest / host.

And a bunch of other 'minor' details.


As I said above, I'm not a developer.  So maybe I'm out of place even making 
these questions and comments.  If so, I apologize.  I do indeed think Qemu 
is an excellent project.  It's very exciting and that's why I'm here 
lurking.

I'm just a little concerned that maybe qemu might always be an incomplete, 
un-stable, un-usable beta program.  An interesting program without the 
refinements and the polishing.

If all you ever do is work on the exciting stuff, and fix the occasional 
problem, then the project may have trouble reaching the level of quality it 
should.

That's why I was wondering what the project schedule actually was.  At what 
points are things going to be added or fixed or improved.

Or is Qemu still in the "free for all" early development stage where people 
work on whatever exciting or sexy thing they feel like, with no actual plan 
or organization?

             reply	other threads:[~2004-08-30 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-30 21:44 Jeebs [this message]
2004-08-30 21:59 ` [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule? John R. Hogerhuis
2004-08-30 22:51   ` Jeebs
2004-08-31 11:59     ` Johannes Schindelin
2004-08-31 15:58       ` Jeebs
2004-08-31 16:27         ` Joe Batt
2004-08-31 17:42           ` Jeebs
2004-09-01 19:25             ` Kai Cherry
2004-09-01 19:33               ` andrej
2004-09-01 19:46               ` Joe Batt
2004-09-01 20:34                 ` Mike Tremoulet
2004-09-01 20:46                   ` Kai Cherry
2004-09-01 20:35                 ` Kai Cherry
2004-09-02 20:46               ` Jim C. Brown
2004-09-03  7:52                 ` [Qemu-devel] Filegetopt (Was: Qemu development schedule?) Renzo Davoli
2004-08-31 16:32         ` [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule? Johannes Schindelin
2004-08-31 17:40           ` Jeebs
2004-09-01 15:43             ` Lionel Ulmer
2004-09-01 17:03             ` John R. Hogerhuis
2004-09-01 19:07               ` Kai Cherry
2004-09-02 10:20               ` Info
2004-08-31 17:42           ` John R. Hogerhuis
2004-08-31 19:07             ` andrej
2004-08-31 19:44               ` Kai Cherry
2004-08-30 22:07 ` Hetz Ben Hamo
2004-08-30 22:59   ` Jeebs
2004-08-30 23:34     ` John R. Hogerhuis
2004-08-31  9:21       ` Kai Cherry
2004-08-31 10:15         ` Patrick Mauritz
2004-08-31 10:23           ` Kai Cherry
2004-08-31 17:23         ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-08-31 19:08           ` Kai Cherry
2004-09-01 20:53             ` Magnus Damm
2004-08-31 20:27           ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-08-31 21:50             ` René Korthaus
2004-09-01 22:04               ` Jim C. Brown
2004-08-31 22:02             ` Patrick Mauritz
2004-09-01 21:58             ` Jim C. Brown
2004-09-02  7:26               ` Lionel Ulmer
2004-09-02 20:56                 ` Jim C. Brown
2004-09-02 23:28                   ` Lionel Ulmer
2004-09-03  0:07                     ` Jim C. Brown
2004-09-03  8:32                       ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-09-03  7:29                     ` Adrian Smarzewski
2004-09-03  8:28                     ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-09-02 23:53                   ` Daniel Serpell
2004-09-03  0:13                     ` Jim C. Brown
2004-09-03  1:35                       ` John R. Hogerhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000501c48eda$a026ab40$20649c3f@computername' \
    --to=jeebs@yango.us \
    --cc=Qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).