From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQE6f-0002A9-4t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 19:34:45 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQE68-000245-7x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 19:34:43 -0400 Received: from [216.127.66.50] (helo=srv01.centurywebdesign.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BQE40-0001jb-0a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 19:32:09 -0400 Received: from Shaggy (82-43-195-40.cable.ubr08.newm.blueyonder.co.uk [82.43.195.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by srv01.centurywebdesign.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4INVtVY006693 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 00:31:56 +0100 Message-ID: <000a01c43d30$5509d9d0$0202a8c0@Shaggy> From: "Jamie Burns" Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 00:32:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C43D38.B5BC0E80" Subject: [Qemu-devel] Power PC speed? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C43D38.B5BC0E80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, With all the commotion surrounding PearPC and its ability to install Mac = OS X, I was wondering what the rough speed of QMEU's PowerPC system = emulation? The PearPC JIT system runs at about 1/40th the speed of its = host. Anybody have a rough idea how the current QEMU compares? J. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C43D38.B5BC0E80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
 
With all the commotion surrounding = PearPC and its=20 ability to install Mac OS X, I was wondering what the rough speed of = QMEU's=20 PowerPC system emulation? The PearPC JIT system runs at about 1/40th the = speed=20 of its host. Anybody have a rough idea how the current QEMU=20 compares?
 
J.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C43D38.B5BC0E80--