From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOGJY-0001u1-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:41:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOGJX-0001to-Qj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:41:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOGJX-0001tl-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:40:59 -0500 Received: from [211.5.2.79] (helo=nm01omta019.dion.ne.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOGLI-0006wc-3A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:42:48 -0500 Message-ID: <000a01c6527e$027951e0$0464a8c0@athlon> From: "Kazu" References: <44285974.9040003@bellard.org><000e01c6525b$9149eb00$0464a8c0@athlon> <44292319.5060500@wasp.net.au> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu version 1.3.0pre5 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:40:58 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:50 PM Brad Campbell wrote: > Kazu wrote: > >> I tested Linux guest/WinXP host but the host OS crashed. > > I believe -kernel-kqemu is still somewhat experimental on Windows host. > >> Redhat 7.2 guest/Fedora Core 4 host with normal kqemu is slower >> than -no-kqemu. Why ? > > Have you got your tmpfs set up correctly so qemu can place its memory swap file in a ramdisk rather > than on disk? > I used tmpfs but the result is the same. Thanks, anyway. Regards, Kazu