From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPUcN-0007PR-7s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:09:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPUcM-0007Ot-Ae for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:09:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FPUcM-0007Oh-6Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:09:30 -0500 Received: from [211.5.2.77] (helo=nm01omta019.dion.ne.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FPUer-0008E8-K6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:12:05 -0500 Message-ID: <000a01c65528$f09ea760$0464a8c0@athlon> From: "Kazu" References: <000401c65486$d2ca4520$0464a8c0@athlon> <2ad73a0603311354v63cea0d6g702fba34855bffad@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Improving timer/clock for win32 Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:09:34 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 6:54 AM André Braga wrote: >Kazu, have you tested whether this avoids the hang (and 100% CPU time >usage by QEMU, and being unable to kill the process by absolutely no >means - Process Explorer's 'kill' included - other than rebooting) on >WinXP host + kqemu and WinXP guest when opening the guests' clock >application by double-clicking it on the taskbar? I know it but it isn't fixed. Regards, Kazu