From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaG18-0007wp-7j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:28:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaG16-0007wV-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:28:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35399 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaG16-0007wR-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:28:52 -0400 Received: from spsmtp01oc.spray.mail2world.com ([209.67.128.166]:4899 helo=spsmtp01oc.mail2world.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaG16-0007BE-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:28:52 -0400 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Andersson?= References: <009DFFEF27CC450ABAC2BF8527FBFE05@mail2world.com> In-Reply-To: <009DFFEF27CC450ABAC2BF8527FBFE05@mail2world.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:26:37 +0200 Message-ID: <002d01c90c71$0af313b0$20d93b10$@tt@home.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002E_01C90C81.CE7BE3B0" Content-Language: sv Subject: [Qemu-devel] RESEND: libqemu.a is not licenced with LGPL? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Det här är ett flerdelat meddelande i MIME-format. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C90C81.CE7BE3B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings developers of QEMU! =20 As I have not received any reply for my previous post I resend it again. = (I guess the topic is not that exiting for most of you) - Is it not the goal to license libqemu.a under LGPL? =20 - What can I expect in the future of QEMU? I have not checked = any other targets than ARM, but I guess this question is valid for most = targets. =20 Keep up the good work! =20 /Best Regards=20 Torbj=F6rn Andersson=20 =20 In the QEMU license file one can read: In particular, the QEMU virtual CPU core library (libqemu.a) is released under the GNU Lesser General Public License. Many hardware device emulation sources are released under the BSD license. and 3) The Tiny Code Generator (TCG) is released under the BSD license (see license headers in files). However, op_addsub.h, helpers.h and helper.c under target-arm is = licensed with GPL, even explicitly in op_addsub.h. Paul: Is your intention to license this code under GPL? /Best Regards Torbj=F6rn=20 ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C90C81.CE7BE3B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings developers of QEMU!

As I have not received any reply for my previous post I = resend it again. (I guess the topic is not that exiting for most of = you)

- Is it not the goal to = license libqemu.a under LGPL? =A0

- What can I expect in = the future of QEMU? I have not checked any other targets than ARM, but I guess this = question is valid for most targets.

Keep up the good work!

/Best Regards

Torbj=F6rn Andersson

In the QEMU license file one can read:

In particular, the QEMU virtual CPU core library (libqemu.a) is
released under the GNU Lesser General Public License. Many hardware
device emulation sources are released under the BSD license.

and

3) The Tiny Code Generator (TCG) is released under the BSD license
(see license headers in files).

However, op_addsub.h, helpers.h and helper.c under target-arm is = licensed with GPL, even explicitly in op_addsub.h.

Paul: Is your intention to license this code under GPL?

/Best Regards Torbj=F6rn

------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C90C81.CE7BE3B0--