From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2420C28CC0 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDDB20644 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:55:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CBDDB20644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=ispras.ru Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVxAw-0002VC-Vl for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:55:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVx8q-0001DR-9X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:53:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVx8p-0004Ef-F4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:53:12 -0400 Received: from mail.ispras.ru ([83.149.199.45]:50912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVx8o-0004By-73 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:53:10 -0400 Received: from PASHAISP (unknown [85.142.117.226]) by mail.ispras.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A1AD540089; Wed, 29 May 2019 14:53:06 +0300 (MSK) From: "Pavel Dovgalyuk" To: "'Paolo Bonzini'" , "'Dr. David Alan Gilbert'" References: <003a01d51611$6251a2b0$26f4e810$@ru> <20190529113045.GE2882@work-vm> <5c55c39b-694b-5d4e-d420-5df0feabc1e8@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5c55c39b-694b-5d4e-d420-5df0feabc1e8@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 14:53:09 +0300 Message-ID: <003f01d51615$16270d40$427527c0$@ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdUWEzI3x2DKEh8sTUie0k1otpZbgwAAdTSw Content-Language: ru X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 83.149.199.45 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] i386: EFER vs 32-bit CPU X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com] > On 29/05/19 13:30, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > >> Should we add a section for i386, which duplicates efer, or just version_id of the main > VMSD should > >> be updated? > > > > You could do: > > > > #ifdef TARGET_X86_64 > > VMSTATE_UINT64(env.efer, X86CPU), > > VMSTATE_UINT64(env.star, X86CPU), > > ... > > > > to become: > > > > VMSTATE_UINT64_TEST(env.efer, X86CPU, efer_needed) > > #ifdef TARGET_X86_64 > > VMSTATE_UINT64(env.star, X86CPU), > > > > > > and then make efer_needed a function that returns true if > > TARGET_X86_64 or it's a new machine type that knows about whatever > > you're going to do with it. > > I prefer adding a subsection for 32-bit, so that EFER is saved/restored > if nonzero. The question is: should we remove EFER from the original VMSD? Pavel Dovgalyuk