From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSfWu-0006Q6-UG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 04:56:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSfWr-0006j6-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 04:56:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSfWr-0006hF-10 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 04:56:09 -0500 References: <1543513531-1151-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1389c712-2e02-80c0-b9e1-4c45b54d35df@redhat.com> <20181130095450.GC8101@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <0070dd1f-eb02-53a9-ca20-a98a50cf0bce@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:56:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181130095450.GC8101@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 0/2] test: replace gtester with a TAP driver List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org On 30/11/18 10:54, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > FYI, for docs about the TAP protocol see: >=20 > https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html >=20 > I've always liked the TAP protocol approach to test output where you pr= int > an ok/not ok status for each piece of the test, as opposed to assertio= n > style tests where you just abort at the first piece that fails.=20 FWIW, this is not what this series does. Each ok/not ok line corresponds to one assertion-style test. Paolo