From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46445)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from
) id 1ZMA1k-0005YO-TF
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:19:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1ZMA1h-0000QI-MC
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:19:16 -0400
Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:54335)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1ZMA1h-0000Q1-Gn
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:19:13 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244])
by mailout1.w1.samsung.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5
2014)) with ESMTP id <0NSH00I5IWBY2I00@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for
qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:19:10 +0100 (BST)
From: Pavel Fedin
References:
In-reply-to:
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:19:09 +0300
Message-id: <00bd01d0cdbc$b0f97ab0$12ec7010$@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-language: ru
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 6/6] Add gicversion option to
virt machine
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
To: 'Peter Maydell'
Cc: 'Shlomo Pongratz' , 'Shlomo Pongratz' , 'QEMU Developers' , 'Christoffer Dall' , 'Eric Auger'
Hello!
> > gicdev =3D qdev_create(NULL, gictype);
> > - qdev_prop_set_uint32(gicdev, "revision", 2);
> > +
> > + for (i =3D 0; i < vbi->smp_cpus; i++) {
> > + CPUState *cpu =3D qemu_get_cpu(i);
> > + CPUARMState *env =3D cpu->env_ptr;
> > + env->nvic =3D gicdev;
> > + }
>=20
> We definitely need to come up with a something cleaner
> than this (which is ugly for two reasons
This could be done:
a) as property
b) as global variable because 'gicdev' is a single of its kind.
But, actually, this is currently only for TCG, which needs it in order =
to forward system register accesses to GICv3 code. Would it be OK if i =
just omit this assignment ?
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia