From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: iotest failure -- test possibly not using sufficiently unique temp filename?
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:44:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010553d9-9dc6-907f-fc74-4cd5614f4a0e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8fwM03PXzkMvLdOWAL0R1Mq8hLmt8O-+NFSri6oHun1w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3365 bytes --]
On 27.09.19 18:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; I just saw this iotest failure (on an s390x box, as it happens):
>
> TEST iotest-qcow2: 130 [fail]
> QEMU --
> "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x"
> -nodefaults -display none -machine accel=qtest
> QEMU_IMG -- "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-img"
> QEMU_IO --
> "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-io"
> --cache writeback -f qcow2
> QEMU_NBD -- "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-nbd"
> IMGFMT -- qcow2 (compat=1.1)
> IMGPROTO -- file
> PLATFORM -- Linux/s390x lxub05 4.15.0-58-generic
> TEST_DIR -- /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch
> SOCKET_SCM_HELPER --
> /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/socket_scm_helper
>
> --- /home/linux1/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/130.out 2019-05-10
> 12:27:16.948075733 -0400
> +++ /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/130.out.bad
> 2019-09-27 12:01:23.649722655 -0400
> @@ -18,20 +18,22 @@
> QEMU X.Y.Z monitor - type 'help' for more information
> (qemu) commit testdisk
> (qemu)
> -image: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT
> -file format: IMGFMT
> -virtual size: 64 MiB (67108864 bytes)
> -backing file: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT.orig
> -backing file format: raw
> +qemu-img: Could not open 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT': Failed to get shared "write" lock
> +Is another process using the image [TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT]?
>
> === Marking image dirty (lazy refcounts) ===
>
> +qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT: Failed to get "write" lock
> +Is another process using the image [TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT]?
> Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
> -wrote 4096/4096 bytes at offset 0
> -4 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +qemu-io: can't open device
> /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.qcow2: Failed
> to get "write" lock
> +Is another process using the image
> [/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.qcow2]?
> +no file open, try 'help open'
> image: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT
> file format: IMGFMT
> virtual size: 64 MiB (67108864 bytes)
> +backing file: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT.orig
> +backing file format: raw
> Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
> backing_file=TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT.orig backing_fmt=raw
> wrote 4096/4096 bytes at offset 0
> 4 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
>
>
>
> This looks suspiciously like the test isn't using a unique
> filename for its disk image: "qemu-iotests/scratch/t.qcow2"
> in the build directory, and so perhaps it has collided with
> another iotest ?
>
> If we run 'make check' with a -j<something> option do the
> iotests all get run serially anyway, or do they run in
> parallel against each other ?
As far as I know, all iotests are executed serially. Anything else
would not work with the same scratch directory.
The only thing I suspect is that some tool has been accidentally left
running by some previous test that still accesses its own image. But I
don’t know.
Max
(I’m personally still very skeptical of running some iotests in make
check, so I don’t have an opinion on the matter other than “If it fails,
we should remove it from make check”.)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-27 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-27 16:39 iotest failure -- test possibly not using sufficiently unique temp filename? Peter Maydell
2019-09-27 16:44 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-10-17 16:41 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-18 6:20 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-18 8:42 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-18 11:43 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=010553d9-9dc6-907f-fc74-4cd5614f4a0e@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).