From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuU37-00089U-6M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:30:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuU2s-00089E-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:30:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47663 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuU2r-00089B-V4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:30:17 -0400 Received: from ragnell.blacknight.ie ([81.17.252.110]:58233) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuU2r-0002tn-EF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:30:18 -0400 Received: from [194.46.87.120] (helo=sweetums) by ragnell.blacknight.ie with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuU24-0002bl-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:29:28 +0000 From: "Mark Burkley" References: <11d301c93090$7e06d290$7a1477b0$@com> <010f01c93810$47ccb500$d7661f00$@com> <4905C997.5060801@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4905C997.5060801@codemonkey.ws> Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] Preliminary patch to implement ehci Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:29:23 -0000 Message-ID: <012c01c93848$ca3c9ae0$5eb5d0a0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-ie Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Thanks for that advice. I will repost as diff again trunk. Mark -----Original Message----- From: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu=emutex.com@nongnu.org [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+qemu=emutex.com@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Liguori Sent: 27 October 2008 14:01 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Preliminary patch to implement ehci Mark Burkley wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just checking, did anyone get a chance to look at this? > > Any suggestions for next steps? Should I post a patch against trunk? > Submitting the patch against 0.9.1 is a non-starter. 0.9.1 is at least a year old and the USB code has been majorly refactored. If you want people to review it, it has to be against trunk. Also make sure that you include a [PATCH] in your subject. Otherwise, it's easily missed on the list. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Thanks, > > Mark >