From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36083)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1Zr2xi-0001Lk-Vl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:02:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1Zr2xd-00065H-Ew
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:02:46 -0400
Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:34025)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1Zr2xd-00064s-8w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:02:41 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245])
	by mailout1.w1.samsung.com
	(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5
	2014)) with ESMTP id <0NWV001UJO4D6U00@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:02:37 +0000 (GMT)
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
References: <00f601d10fc2$7673fd00$635bf700$@samsung.com>
	<CAPokK=obxkaiws4gZPx0HBUHLmhFfQcdmLnN4VXTgkT7WGM52Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAPokK=obxkaiws4gZPx0HBUHLmhFfQcdmLnN4VXTgkT7WGM52Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:02:36 +0300
Message-id: <013701d110af$5f601a70$1e204f50$@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-language: ru
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: Extract some external ARM
 CPU API
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: 'Peter Crosthwaite' <crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Peter Maydell' <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, 'Shlomo Pongratz' <shlomopongratz@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, 'Shlomo Pongratz' <shlomo.pongratz@huawei.com>

 Hello!

> We have plenty of precedent in tree for interrupt controllers being
> compiled as arch-specific for reasons such as this. Can we just
> promote GIC to an obj-y (much the same way the KVM GIC or V7MNVIC are
> promoted)? You should them have access to cpu.h and the CP interface.

 Huh, indeed, it's so simple... I failed to notice this.
 Peter, what do you think, if we indeed simply move gicv3 implementation from common-obj-y to obj-y?

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia