From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48231)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from
) id 1ZXrpZ-0002JO-SB
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:19:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1ZXrpV-00009n-S3
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:19:05 -0400
Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:60546)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1ZXrpV-00008v-IS
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:19:01 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244])
by mailout1.w1.samsung.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5
2014)) with ESMTP id <0NU50041OP3MA100@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for
qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 15:18:58 +0100 (BST)
From: Pavel Fedin
References:
<01123b8a3d47648ef362909967f22c7dab0cfd71.1440584396.git.p.fedin@samsung.com>
In-reply-to:
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 17:18:57 +0300
Message-id: <01ec01d0e71c$a3b60520$eb220f60$@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-language: ru
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 5/5] hw/arm/virt: Add
gic-version option to virt machine
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
To: 'Peter Maydell'
Cc: 'Shlomo Pongratz' , 'Shlomo Pongratz' , 'QEMU Developers' , 'Eric Auger'
Hello!
> I think we need to leave enough space for all of GICC/GICV/GICH
> (that's 2 pages for GICC, 2 for GICV, 1 for GICH). They're optional
> in a GICv3, but we may want them for emulation later on and if we
> haven't left ourselves enough space we'll be a bit stuck.
Do we really need this? Are we going to have a model with HYP mode, =
inside of which we could run another model? BTW, our GICv2 =
implementation also doesn't assume that it can have GICV/GICH.
Additionally, according to GIC-500 arch manual, GICC_DIR with affinity =
routing enabled has an offset of 0x10000, and it's 17 pages instead of =
2.
Do we want to waste our precious address space?
But, well, i have calculated that we would have 124 maximum CPUs =
instead of 126. So - your final word on this?
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia