From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0TBV-0002kk-AR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:29:49 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0T3k-0001T8-Qq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:54 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0T3d-0001Px-M3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:41 -0500
Received: from [62.27.20.254] (helo=koniczek.de)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0SnX-0006WW-B1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:05:03 -0500
Received: from vaion (pD958E0D5.dip.t-dialin.net [217.88.224.213])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by koniczek.de (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id j1DNCPn2017219
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:12:25 +0100
Message-ID: <01f401c51220$6f6f3660$6701a8c0@vaion>
From: "Martin Koniczek" <martin@koniczek.de>
References: <200502121018.09039.jm@poure.com><20050213170136.GB28580@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org><001e01c511f3$1aae1ab0$254d21d1@computername>	<20050213182734.GA29432@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org><001c01c51203$24d2e510$254d21d1@computername>
	<420FD23C.8000204@kadu.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Plex86 and Qemu
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:04:46 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-2";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> U=BFytkownik jeebs@yango.us napisa=B3:
>> Yeah... Some Linux mail readers do seem to have problems with line
>> lengths.
>
> It's just a matter of keeping standards, netiquette and so on... by
> users and software. majority of windows users can be detected using thi=
s
> criteria ;) but it's an endless discussion.

i don't get this... at least outlook express, and i think this is the
program the vast majority of windows users use for sending mail, does pro=
per
line breaking... or does this happen if you - *shiver* - send HTML mails?