From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55795 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRQep-0007KC-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:42:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRQeo-0006Yt-74 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:42:43 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:37256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRQen-0006Yo-Uu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:42:42 -0500 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so4506636wwi.10 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:42:41 -0800 (PST) From: "Stefano Bonifazi" References: <4CFF6E8F.7000300@gmail.com> <1291812551-12590-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4CFFFC1A.1090001@gmail.com> <4D008246.9070500@redhat.com> <4D0111E5.5070702@gmail.com> <4D01EA70.1040906@redhat.com> <4D029EE5.40202@gmail.com> <4D02A030.6080400@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4D02A030.6080400@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:42:39 +0100 Message-ID: <02ab01cb9941$a9f571b0$fde05510$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: it Subject: [Qemu-devel] RE: [PATCH] fix qruncom compilation problems List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: 'Paolo Bonzini' Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org -----Original Message----- From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com]=20 Sent: venerd=EC 10 dicembre 2010 22:49 To: Stefano Bonifazi Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix qruncom compilation problems >For runcom (without the "q") this wouldn't work, because it runs the = code in vm86 mode. It's possible that this is ok for qruncom with other = >changes to let the TCG backend know about vm86_mem. So informing the interpreter with=20 >> page_set_flags(0x00000000+vm86_mem, 0x110000+vm86_mem, PAGE_WRITE | PAGE_READ |=20 >> PAGE_EXEC | PAGE_VALID);=20 Would be not enough? >I was looking at this in my free time and it seriously shrunk later, so = I'm afraid I cannot help. Surely I do understand you! Your help has been very very useful and appreciated already thank you! May you direct me to somebody who's = working on it? Some TCG guru who could understand immediately what's wrong? :) I noticed, far now, that each question on this mailing list is answered only by one QEMU developer, is that a sort of policy or just a = coincidence?=20 Again thank you! Best regards! Stefano B.