From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEE2C43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A05C205F4 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Pk08aSpV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7A05C205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39818 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icVmt-0004NZ-Kr for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:37:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icVlS-00031U-SW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:36:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icVlR-0004NE-OF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:36:26 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:53579 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icVlR-0004Mx-J5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:36:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575470185; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wXo36HgzlbTfTaQKoAHPr3/cD5/dZ7/sHcvhO/TIFo4=; b=Pk08aSpVVnt322+iGAUnZCSmD9G8/kgmp119xLXF1a7gtSg3Aun5vj4GlGD4j4LaeVOJ5X fgqZHdTwvMDRQohVnCX9IRYsO7/1OaRD5bkJEBgOgoUOFsJZnjfmtjNdi1T1TTJWuKUTge a/+uVMmkMCVcs4WuuIvIhKN1EZJa26c= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-275-wHK5jtmaOnu0l_1a7dMO_A-1; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:36:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834F4911FA; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.3.116.171] (ovpn-116-171.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.171]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B8C5D6B7; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? To: Kevin Wolf , Gerd Hoffmann References: <20191126102600.GG556568@redhat.com> <20191126121416.GE2928@work-vm> <87k17ekhs9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191203105341.GB3078@work-vm> <20191203111949.GB267814@redhat.com> <87o8wofsda.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191204081726.md3qakjtszftnuag@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20191204132810.GB20250@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com> From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-ID: <02eec949-f768-dd42-fb46-284489c1a964@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:36:12 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191204132810.GB20250@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-MC-Unique: wHK5jtmaOnu0l_1a7dMO_A-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , qemu-block@nongnu.org, mszeredi@redhat.com, Jason Wang , QEMU Developers , Markus Armbruster , vgoyal@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi , =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , Max Reitz , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 12/4/19 7:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 04.12.2019 um 09:17 hat Gerd Hoffmann geschrieben: >> Hi, >> >>>> | ... >>>> +- qemu-edid >>> >>> Has its own MAINTAINERS section, together with hw/display/edit* and >>> include/hw/display/edid.h. I'm not sure moving it hw/display/ is a good >>> idea. Gerd? >> >> Sort-of makes sense. My personal preference would be a tools/ directory >> for all those small utilities though. > > I think I would like that better than throwing tools into block/ where > currently mostly just block drivers live. Ooh, I should have read this sub-thread before writing my reply at the top level. Yes, I like the idea of tools/ for qemu-img, qemu-io, and qemu-nbd better than block/. > > Or, if we want to move the tools there, we'd need another directory > level inside block/ to keep things reasonably organised. Separating drivers from executables sounds worthwhile either way, whether that division is by a new tools/ or by a subdirectory in block/. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org