qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/qtest: kill off QEMU with SIGKILL when qtest exits abnormally
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:47:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0377cbbc-1d6c-67bc-eaef-aec105694088@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513143743.198390-1-berrange@redhat.com>

On 13/05/2022 16.37, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> If a qtest program exits without calling qtest_quit(), then the
> QEMU emulator process will remain running in the background forever.
> 
> Unfortunately this scenario is exactly what will happen when a
> g_assert() check triggers an abort().
> 
> Prior to switching to use of 'meson test', this problem would
> cause tap-driver.pl to hang forever. It was waiting for its
> STDIN to report EOF, but that would never happen due to the
> ophaned QEMU emulator processes keeping the pipe open forever.
> Fortunately this doesn't happen with meson, but it is still
> desirable to not leak QEMU processes when asserts fire.
> 
> Using the Linux specific prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG) syscall, we
> can ensure that QEMU gets sent SIGKILL as soon as the controlling
> qtest exits, despite being daemonized.
> 
> Note, technically the death signal is sent when the *thread* that
> called fork() exits. IOW, if you are calling qtest_init() in one
> thread, letting that thread exit, and then expecting to run
> qtest_quit() in a different thread, things are not going to work
> out. Fortunately that is not a scenario that exists in qtests,
> as pairs of qtest_init and qtest_quit are always called from the
> same thread.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
>   tests/qtest/libqtest.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
> index 228357f1ea..553e82e492 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
>   #include <sys/socket.h>
>   #include <sys/wait.h>
>   #include <sys/un.h>
> +#ifdef __linux__
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#endif /* __linux__ */
>   
>   #include "libqtest.h"
>   #include "libqmp.h"
> @@ -301,6 +304,21 @@ QTestState *qtest_init_without_qmp_handshake(const char *extra_args)
>       s->expected_status = 0;
>       s->qemu_pid = fork();
>       if (s->qemu_pid == 0) {
> +#ifdef __linux__
> +        /*
> +         * If the controlling qtest process exits without calling
> +         * the qtest_quit() method, the QEMU processes will get
> +         * orphaned and remain running forever in the background.
> +         *
> +         * Missing qtest_quit() calls are, unfortunately, exactly
> +         * what happen when a g_assert() check triggers abort() in
> +         * a failing test scenario.
> +         *
> +         * This PR_SET_PDEATHSIG setup will ensure QEMU will
> +         * get terminated with SIGKILL.
> +         */
> +        prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL, 0, 0, 0);
> +#endif /* __linux__ */
>           if (!g_setenv("QEMU_AUDIO_DRV", "none", true)) {
>               exit(1);
>           }

Would it make sense to install a signal handler for SIGABRT instead and make 
sure that we tear down the QEMU instance there? ... that would then also 
work for other non-Linux operating systems?

  Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-13 14:37 [PATCH] tests/qtest: kill off QEMU with SIGKILL when qtest exits abnormally Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-05-13 14:47 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2022-05-13 14:49   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-13 15:40     ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0377cbbc-1d6c-67bc-eaef-aec105694088@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).