From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390x/pci: drive ISM reset from subsystem reset
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:11:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04379048-1ff0-482b-8fc7-74cc13bb5a21@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0131acaf-6daf-46b3-9368-e491766e2825@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/17/24 10:19 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 1/17/24 6:01 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> Adding Alex,
>>
>> On 1/16/24 23:31, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> ISM devices are sensitive to manipulation of the IOMMU, so the ISM device
>>> needs to be reset before the vfio-pci device is reset (triggering a full
>>> UNMAP). In order to ensure this occurs, trigger ISM device resets from
>>> subsystem_reset before triggering the PCI bus reset (which will also
>>> trigger vfio-pci reset). This only needs to be done for ISM devices
>>> which were enabled for use by the guest.
>>> Further, ensure that AIF is disabled as part of the reset event.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ef1535901a ("s390x: do a subsystem reset before the unprotect on reboot")
>>> Fixes: 03451953c7 ("s390x/pci: reset ISM passthrough devices on shutdown and system reset")
>>> Reported-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 2 ++
>>> include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>>> index 347580ebac..3e57d5faca 100644
>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>>> @@ -151,20 +151,12 @@ static void s390_pci_shutdown_notifier(Notifier *n, void *opaque)
>>> pci_device_reset(pbdev->pdev);
>>> }
>>> -static void s390_pci_reset_cb(void *opaque)
>>> -{
>>> - S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = opaque;
>>> -
>>> - pci_device_reset(pbdev->pdev);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static void s390_pci_perform_unplug(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
>>> {
>>> HotplugHandler *hotplug_ctrl;
>>> if (pbdev->pft == ZPCI_PFT_ISM) {
>>> notifier_remove(&pbdev->shutdown_notifier);
>>> - qemu_unregister_reset(s390_pci_reset_cb, pbdev);
>>> }
>>> /* Unplug the PCI device */
>>> @@ -1132,7 +1124,6 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
>>> if (pbdev->pft == ZPCI_PFT_ISM) {
>>> pbdev->shutdown_notifier.notify = s390_pci_shutdown_notifier;
>>> qemu_register_shutdown_notifier(&pbdev->shutdown_notifier);
>>> - qemu_register_reset(s390_pci_reset_cb, pbdev);
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> pbdev->fh |= FH_SHM_EMUL;
>>> @@ -1279,6 +1270,23 @@ static void s390_pci_enumerate_bridge(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *pdev,
>>> pci_default_write_config(pdev, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS, s->bus_no, 1);
>>> }
>>> +void s390_pci_ism_reset(void)
>>> +{
>>> + S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
>>> +
>>> + S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, *next;
>>> +
>>> + /* Trigger reset event for each passthrough ISM device currently in-use */
>>> + QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(pbdev, &s->zpci_devs, link, next) {
>>> + if (pbdev->interp && pbdev->pft == ZPCI_PFT_ISM &&
>>> + pbdev->fh & FH_MASK_ENABLE) {
>>> + s390_pci_kvm_aif_disable(pbdev);
>>> +
>>> + pci_device_reset(pbdev->pdev);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>
>>
>> Could we instead define a VFIOPCIDevice::resetfn handler for these
>> ISM devices (1014:04ed) ? This would be cleaner if possible.
>>
>> If so, as a prerequisite, we would need to introduce in a little VFIO
>> helper to define custom reset handlers.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> C.
>>
>
> Oh interesting, I had not noticed that. This may well work -- resetfn is currently setup via vfio_setup_resetfn_quirk but it would probably be easier to have a helper that takes the vdev and a function pointer so that we can provide a platform-specific reset handler (rather than having hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c worry about CONFIG_S390 etc). I'll have to play around with this.
>
>
Hmm, it was a good idea but I don't think this will work. I tried to hack something together today but I'm definitely seeing paths where the vfio_listener_region_del happens before the call to vfio_pci_reset (which would ultimately trigger the new custom resetfn).
Perhaps we should stick with the call from subsystem_reset -- it will ensure that the ISM cleanup happens after guest CPUs are stopped but before vfio does its cleanup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 22:31 [PATCH 0/3] s390x/pci: fix ISM reset Matthew Rosato
2024-01-16 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390x/pci: avoid double enable/disable of aif Matthew Rosato
2024-01-17 1:57 ` Eric Farman
2024-01-17 15:06 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-01-17 10:54 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-01-17 15:11 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-01-16 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] s390x/pci: refresh fh before disabling aif Matthew Rosato
2024-01-17 2:01 ` Eric Farman
2024-01-17 10:31 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-01-17 15:07 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-01-17 10:40 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-01-17 15:17 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-01-16 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390x/pci: drive ISM reset from subsystem reset Matthew Rosato
2024-01-17 3:01 ` Eric Farman
2024-01-17 15:07 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-01-17 11:01 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-01-17 15:19 ` Matthew Rosato
2024-01-17 21:11 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2024-01-18 7:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-01-18 6:03 ` [PATCH 0/3] s390x/pci: fix ISM reset Michael Tokarev
2024-01-18 7:19 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 7:37 ` Michael Tokarev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04379048-1ff0-482b-8fc7-74cc13bb5a21@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).