From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com
Cc: david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:46:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <050f39c7-a670-7592-ee50-fef6ea4bdb0f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1595517236-17823-1-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/23/20 5:13 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> I noticed that after kernel commit abafbc55 'vfio-pci: Invalidate mmaps
> and block MMIO access on disabled memory' vfio-pci via qemu on s390x
> fails spectacularly, with errors in qemu like:
>
> qemu-system-s390x: vfio_region_read(0001:00:00.0:region0+0x0, 4) failed: Input/output error
>
> From read to bar 0 originating out of hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c:zpci_read_bar().
>
> So, I'm trying to figure out how to get vfio-pci happy again on s390x. From
> a bit of tracing, we seem to be triggering the new trap in
> __vfio_pci_memory_enabled(). Sure enough, if I just force this function to
> return 'true' as a test case, things work again.
> The included patch attempts to enforce the setting, which restores everything
> to working order but also triggers vfio_bar_restore() in the process.... So
> this isn't the right answer, more of a proof-of-concept.
>
> @Alex: Any guidance on what needs to happen to make qemu-s390x happy with this
> recent kernel change?
>
> @Nilkas/@Pierre: I wonder if this might be related to host device is_virtfn?
> I note that my host device lspci output looks like:
>
> 0000:00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 Family [ConnectX-4 Lx Virtual Function]
>
> But the device is not marked as is_virtfn.. Otherwise, Alex's fix
> from htps://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/25/628 should cover the case.
With commit e5794cf1a270 ("s390/pci: create links between PFs and VFs") I introduced
the is_physfn field to struct zpci_dev which gets set through the
CLP Query PCI Function. Also with that commit this being 0 will set
is_virtfn to 1.
Interestingly looking at s390-pci-inst.c in QEMU I'd think that
on QEMU this should already be 0 and thus is_virtfn should be set
with Linux >5.8-rc1 and the missing case is actually for passing through
a PF where it would wrongly be 0 too.
Note: If the Linux instance does not see the
parent PF however the only way I know to test if it is a VF from userspace
is checking if /sys/bus/pci/devices/<dev>/vfn is non-zero which is platform
specific and currently wrongly set 0 on QEMU for VFs.
If the PF is known the mentioned commit will also create the
/sys/bus/pci/devices/<dev>/physfn symlink as on other platforms.
> Matthew Rosato (1):
> s390x/pci: Enforce PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY for vfio-pci
>
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-23 15:13 [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement Matthew Rosato
2020-07-23 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: Enforce PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY for vfio-pci Matthew Rosato
2020-07-23 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement Alex Williamson
2020-07-23 18:12 ` Matthew Rosato
2020-07-27 15:40 ` Pierre Morel
2020-07-27 16:37 ` Matthew Rosato
2020-07-27 16:47 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-28 9:33 ` Niklas Schnelle
2020-07-28 12:52 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-28 14:13 ` Niklas Schnelle
2020-07-28 8:59 ` Niklas Schnelle
2020-07-24 9:46 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2020-07-24 9:53 ` Niklas Schnelle
2020-07-24 14:15 ` Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=050f39c7-a670-7592-ee50-fef6ea4bdb0f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).