qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Roman Bolshakov <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>
Cc: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	Cameron Esfahani <dirty@apple.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] i386: hvf: Implement CPU kick
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:43:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0549a18b-aedf-d88f-1765-65e333ee2e00@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630101228.GA39334@SPB-NB-133.local>

Ok, I'll review the patch to see what you've implemented.  Thanks!

Paolo

On 30/06/20 12:12, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 29/06/20 16:04, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
>>> My approach is based
>>> hv_vcpu_run() and should hopefully work almost anywhere where
>>> Hypervisor.framework is available because Hypervisor framework exposes
>>> timer value
>>> (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/hypervisor/vmcs_guest_vmx_timer_value)
>>> since macOS 10.10.3+.
>>
>> There are a few other constants for which it would be unwise to write
>> from userspace, so that's not a big consolation. :)
>>
> 
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> So, I've tried Big Sur Beta and it has exactly the same performance
> issue with hv_vcpu_run_until() while hv_vcpu_run() works as good as it
> worked on 10.15.5. I've submitted FB7827341 to Apple wrt the issue.
> 
>>> I can also test how hv_vcpu_run_until() performs with HV_DEADLINE_FOREVER
>>> on the Beta. And if the performance issues with VMX-preemption timer and
>>> hv_vcpu_run_until() are fixed there.
>>
>> Thanks!  The main thing to test on Big Sur would be: 1) whether the
>> preemption timer bit in the pin controls "sticks" to 0 after setting it
> 
> It does not. If it's set, it stays there.
> 
>> 2) whether the bit reads back as zero after
>> hv_vcpu_run_until(HV_DEADLINE_FOREVER).
>>
> 
> Likewise, it's not cleared if set.
> 
> As far as I understand, hv_vcpu_run_until(HV_DEADLINE_FOREVER) works
> like hv_vcpu_run() without VMX-preemption timer. Otherwise
> hv_vcpu_run_until() implicitly sets VMX-preemption timer Pin-based
> control and sets the timer value.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman
> 
> Here's the patch over v2 that adds support of hv_vcpu_run_until() on Big Sur:
> diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c
> index 317304aa1d..ad202f7358 100644
> --- a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c
> +++ b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c
> @@ -72,8 +72,12 @@
>  #include "sysemu/accel.h"
>  #include "target/i386/cpu.h"
>  
> +#if defined(__MAC_10_16) && __MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED >= __MAC_10_16
> +#define HVF_MAX_DEADLINE HV_DEADLINE_FOREVER
> +#else
>  /* Maximum value of VMX-preemption timer */
>  #define HVF_MAX_DEADLINE UINT32_MAX
> +#endif
>  
>  HVFState *hvf_state;
>  
> @@ -693,6 +697,7 @@ int hvf_vcpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>      CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
>      int ret = 0;
>      uint64_t rip = 0;
> +    hv_return_t r;
>  
>      if (hvf_process_events(cpu)) {
>          return EXCP_HLT;
> @@ -718,10 +723,22 @@ int hvf_vcpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>          /* Use VMX-preemption timer trick only if available */
>          if (rvmcs(cpu->hvf_fd, VMCS_PIN_BASED_CTLS) &
>              VMCS_PIN_BASED_CTLS_VMX_PREEMPT_TIMER) {
> +#if defined(__MAC_10_16) && __MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED >= __MAC_10_16
> +            r = hv_vcpu_run_until(cpu->hvf_fd,
> +                                  atomic_read(&env->hvf_deadline));
> +        } else {
> +            /*
> +             * Equivalent to behaviour of hv_vcpu_run() with VMX-preemption
> +             * timer disabled, prone to kick loss.
> +             */
> +            r = hv_vcpu_run_until(cpu->hvf_fd, HVF_MAX_DEADLINE);
> +        }
> +#else
>              wvmcs(cpu->hvf_fd, VMCS_PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE,
>                    atomic_read(&env->hvf_deadline));
>          }
> -        hv_return_t r  = hv_vcpu_run(cpu->hvf_fd);
> +        r = hv_vcpu_run(cpu->hvf_fd);
> +#endif
>          atomic_set(&env->hvf_deadline, HVF_MAX_DEADLINE);
>          assert_hvf_ok(r);
>  
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-24 22:58 [PATCH 0/8] Improve synchronization between QEMU and HVF Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 1/8] i386: hvf: Set env->eip in macvm_set_rip() Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] i386: hvf: Move synchronize functions to sysemu Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25  7:09   ` Claudio Fontana
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] i386: hvf: Add hvf_cpu_synchronize_pre_loadvm() Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] i386: hvf: Implement CPU kick Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25  7:07   ` Claudio Fontana
2020-06-25 10:51     ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25 10:28   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-25 15:57     ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25 18:34       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-29 11:31         ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-29 13:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-29 13:29             ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-29 13:35               ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-29 14:04                 ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-29 14:18                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-30 10:12                     ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-30 10:43                       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] i386: hvf: Don't duplicate register reset Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] i386: hvf: Drop hvf_reset_vcpu() Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25 10:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-25 12:36     ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25 13:30       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-25 15:02         ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25 18:26           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-29 12:58         ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] i386: hvf: Clean up synchronize functions Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] MAINTAINERS: Add Cameron as HVF co-maintainer Roman Bolshakov
2020-06-25 11:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] Improve synchronization between QEMU and HVF Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0549a18b-aedf-d88f-1765-65e333ee2e00@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=cfontana@suse.de \
    --cc=dirty@apple.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=r.bolshakov@yadro.com \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).