Re: [PATCH v10 05/10] virtio-iommu: Add replay() memory region callback

[Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>]

Hi Jean,

On 10/8/20 7:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> From: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
> 
> Implement the replay callback to setup all mappings for a new memory
> region.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
> v10: Homogenize tracepoint arguments
> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/virtio/trace-events   |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
> index 7e6e3cf5200..d2b96846134 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -861,6 +861,46 @@ static gint int_cmp(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b, gpointer user_data)
>      return (ua > ub) - (ua < ub);
>  }
>  
> +static gboolean virtio_iommu_remap(gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer data)
> +{
> +    VirtIOIOMMUMapping *mapping = (VirtIOIOMMUMapping *) value;
> +    VirtIOIOMMUInterval *interval = (VirtIOIOMMUInterval *) key;
> +    IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr = (IOMMUMemoryRegion *) data;
> +
> +    trace_virtio_iommu_remap(mr->parent_obj.name, interval->low, interval->high,
> +                             mapping->phys_addr);
> +    virtio_iommu_notify_unmap(mr, interval->low, interval->high);
> +    virtio_iommu_notify_map(mr, interval->low, interval->high,
> +                            mapping->phys_addr);
I don't get the preliminary unmap with the same data. Why isn't the map
sufficient to replay?

The default implementation only notifies for valid entries.
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr, IOMMUNotifier *n)
> +{
> +    IOMMUDevice *sdev = container_of(mr, IOMMUDevice, iommu_mr);
> +    VirtIOIOMMU *s = sdev->viommu;
> +    uint32_t sid;
> +    VirtIOIOMMUEndpoint *ep;
> +
> +    sid = virtio_iommu_get_bdf(sdev);
> +
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&s->mutex);
> +
> +    if (!s->endpoints) {
> +        goto unlock;
> +    }
> +
> +    ep = g_tree_lookup(s->endpoints, GUINT_TO_POINTER(sid));
> +    if (!ep || !ep->domain) {
> +        goto unlock;
> +    }
> +
> +    g_tree_foreach(ep->domain->mappings, virtio_iommu_remap, mr);
> +
> +unlock:
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&s->mutex);
> +}
> +
>  static void virtio_iommu_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  {
>      VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
> @@ -1091,6 +1131,7 @@ static void virtio_iommu_memory_region_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
>      IOMMUMemoryRegionClass *imrc = IOMMU_MEMORY_REGION_CLASS(klass);
>  
>      imrc->translate = virtio_iommu_translate;
> +    imrc->replay = virtio_iommu_replay;
>  }
>  
>  static const TypeInfo virtio_iommu_info = {
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/trace-events b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> index 65a48555c78..16f4729db4b 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ virtio_iommu_report_fault(uint8_t reason, uint32_t flags, uint32_t endpoint, uin
>  virtio_iommu_fill_resv_property(uint32_t devid, uint8_t subtype, uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "dev= %d, type=%d start=0x%"PRIx64" end=0x%"PRIx64
>  virtio_iommu_notify_map(const char *name, uint64_t virt_start, uint64_t virt_end, uint64_t phys_start) "mr=%s virt_start=0x%"PRIx64" virt_end=0x%"PRIx64" phys_start=0x%"PRIx64
>  virtio_iommu_notify_unmap(const char *name, uint64_t virt_start, uint64_t virt_end) "mr=%s virt_start=0x%"PRIx64" virt_end=0x%"PRIx64
> +virtio_iommu_remap(const char *name, uint64_t virt_start, uint64_t virt_end, uint64_t phys_start) "mr=%s virt_start=0x%"PRIx64" virt_end=0x%"PRIx64" phys_start=0x%"PRIx64
>  
>  # virtio-mem.c
>  virtio_mem_send_response(uint16_t type) "type=%" PRIu16
> 
Thanks

Eric