qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, wangyanan55@huawei.com, philmd@linaro.org,
	marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eduardo@habkost.net,
	armbru@redhat.com, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: filter deprecated properties based on model expansion type
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:10:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05dbeed5-3ef9-4cda-af0d-8d4adf5ab6d5@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f31312a9-60ba-4b34-93fa-27c4fc97d15a@redhat.com>

On 7/26/24 4:03 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.07.24 22:00, Collin Walling wrote:
>> On 7/26/24 3:57 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 25.07.24 20:39, Collin Walling wrote:
>>>> Currently, there is no way to execute the query-cpu-model-expansion
>>>> command to retrieve a comprehenisve list of deprecated properties, as
>>>> the result is dependent per-model. To enable this, the expansion output
>>>> is modified as such:
>>>>
>>>> When reporting a "static" CPU model, the command will only show
>>>> deprecated properties that are a subset of the model's *enabled*
>>>> properties. This is more accurate than how the query was handled
>>>> before, which blindly reported properties that were never introduced
>>>> for certain models.
>>>>
>>>> When reporting a "full" CPU model, show the *entire* list of deprecated
>>>> properties regardless if they are supported on the model. A full
>>>> expansion outputs all known CPU model properties anyway, so it makes
>>>> sense to report all deprecated properties here too. This allows
>>>> management apps to query a single model (e.g. host) to acquire the
>>>> full list of deprecated properties.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, the @deprecated-props array has been moved from the
>>>> CpuModelInfo struct to the CpuModelExpansionInfo struct, since the data
>>>> did not belong in the former.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>> Suggested-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm, this does not apply on current master ... maybe because Thomas
>>> already merged part of it?
>>>
>>
>> Uh oh, sorry about that.  I'll fix this right now and post a v5 with a
>> corrected rebase on master.
> 
> It would be great if the changelog could then only describe the diff to
> already-merged:
> 
> commit da5cd572710cc4ad7e2c653614a4ab1598b17e78
> Author: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> Date:   Thu Jul 25 14:39:09 2024 -0400
> 
>      target/s390x: filter deprecated properties based on model expansion type
>      
>      Currently, there is no way to execute the query-cpu-model-expansion
>      command to retrieve a comprehenisve list of deprecated properties, as
>      the result is dependent per-model. To enable this, the expansion output
>      is modified as such:
>      
>      When reporting a "static" CPU model, the command will only show
>      deprecated properties that are a subset of the model's *enabled*
>      properties. This is more accurate than how the query was handled
>      before, which blindly reported properties that were never introduced
>      for certain models.
>      
>      When reporting a "full" CPU model, show the *entire* list of deprecated
>      properties regardless if they are supported on the model. A full
>      expansion outputs all known CPU model properties anyway, so it makes
>      sense to report all deprecated properties here too. This allows
>      management apps to query a single model (e.g. host) to acquire the
>      full list of deprecated properties.
>      
>      Additionally, the @deprecated-props array has been moved from the
>      CpuModelInfo struct to the CpuModelExpansionInfo struct, since the data
>      did not belong in the former.
> 
> 

Okay, yeah... a previous iteration was already merged:
eed0e8ffa38f0695c0519508f6e4f5a3297cbd67.

Since that patch describes the "static" and "full" expansion stuff, I'll
rework the commit message for this one to explain that it moves the
@deprecated-props from CpuModelInfo to CpuModelExpansionInfo.

-- 
Regards,
  Collin



      reply	other threads:[~2024-07-26 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-25 18:39 [PATCH v4] target/s390x: filter deprecated properties based on model expansion type Collin Walling
2024-07-26 19:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-26 20:00   ` Collin Walling
2024-07-26 20:03     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-26 20:10       ` Collin Walling [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05dbeed5-3ef9-4cda-af0d-8d4adf5ab6d5@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).