From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqElg-0007hp-97 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 04:36:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqElb-0004Wp-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 04:36:04 -0400 References: <1504286483-23327-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <05efe60e-e4d0-24e1-548b-b587bf5153ff@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:35:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/20] ARM SMMUv3 Emulation Support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , Prem Mallappa , Alex Williamson , Andrew Jones , Christoffer Dall , Radha.Chintakuntla@cavium.com, Sunil.Goutham@cavium.com, Radha Mohan , Trey Cain , Bharat Bhushan , Tomasz Nowicki , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Will Deacon , jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, Peter Xu , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , wtownsen@redhat.com Hi Peter, On 07/09/2017 14:39, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 September 2017 at 18:21, Eric Auger wrote: >> This series implements the emulation code for ARM SMMUv3. >> >> Changes since v6: >> - DPDK testpmd now running on guest with 2 assigned VFs >> - Changed the instantiation method: add the following option to >> the QEMU command line >> -device smmuv3 # for virtio/vhost use cases >> -device smmuv3,caching-mode # for vfio use cases (based on [1]) >> - splitted the series into smaller patches to allow the review >> - the VFIO integration based on "tlbi-on-map" smmuv3 driver >> is isolated from the rest: last 2 patches, not for upstream. >> This is shipped for testing/bench until a better solution is found. >> - Reworked permission flag checks and event generation > > Hi Eric -- I see you've upgraded this from an RFC to a PATCH set. > Do you want the patches reviewed and (eventually) taken into git > now? Yes I split the series to make it more reviewable and from a functional point of view I have run all major use cases. So now I would encourage people to start reviewing the series (focusing on patches 1-18). Thanks Eric > > thanks > -- PMM >