From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51FFC433E7 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25818206B2 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EFFidf73" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 25818206B2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49640 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQmjm-0002ZP-7d for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 03:22:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQmim-0001QI-NF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 03:21:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:30073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQmil-0005Ov-5b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 03:21:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602228102; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aZl8dodm74CqJfoeYznTfj0YBxrMVarNx+iqolVZ7Mw=; b=EFFidf73o9FaiaxVFXUQQkqDwV2OOnHCK9TBal9GLMKpfJZYD0l0otDvwCE8cAgf0ScX8I lpTxXDLpz7n8wxzuLgGic/1RR8p05n2cn7KcJiXGWeItMcOL4g37MFUeaTzD7pf1t52vqY 0IOiGz/cNSHoWeLtGUGPnAhWlLvB1Ao= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-305-PDIXAg6NOIevaUjeza0M0w-1; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 03:21:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: PDIXAg6NOIevaUjeza0M0w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335EE835B8C; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-112-47.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.47]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90631002C03; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: does make check now require TCG? Or is it a parallelism issue? To: Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson References: <11ef73ff-4178-b3e8-2e49-44ff014a13ed@suse.de> <569520f6-adf6-6212-9625-a184bf499e24@redhat.com> <6fe91a5a-c136-9af3-c48a-97ccdca7a543@suse.de> <3c527b0f-afa1-4b86-4fa5-9acca2a296bd@linaro.org> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <061f1bde-db0e-bc34-dae0-161606092bb0@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:21:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/09 02:34:37 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.214, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alex Bennee , Claudio Fontana , qemu-devel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 08/10/2020 20.24, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > Il gio 8 ott 2020, 20:05 Richard Henderson > ha scritto: > > Ah, TARGET_DIRS isn't being pruned anymore when a target is disabled for > lack > of accelerator. > > Paolo, side effect of 8a19980e3f ("configure: move accelerator logic to > meson")?  I guess we should move the setting of TARGET_DIRS to meson as > well. > > > TARGET_DIRS is pruned by Meson, I didn't add any back propagation to make > because it is not really needed; qemu-iotests only every uses the "host > architecture" QEMU binary (see tests/qemu-iotests/common.config), > check-block + --target-list has never worked. I haven't tried since the meson conversion, but at least a couple of months ago, it was perfectly fine to run configure with --target-list=tricore-softmmu and then to run "make check-block" afterwards. That qemu_arch setting from tests/qemu-iotests/common.config is just used for the preferred binary, but if it is not available, tests/qemu-iotests/check falls back to any other qemu-system-xxx binary that it can find. Thomas