From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5793BC4743D for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F065061263 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:40:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F065061263 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:47398 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqdqI-0001HX-4H for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:40:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqdm3-0002Pg-Cg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:36:16 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:32577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqdlz-0000o1-1J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:36:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623166568; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+lRB7po5tcVn4f9KYWwl4QQJ7HgFM1NIf+AFIwAvD+w=; b=jTmuaTvU1RiTX8q9zN67v3wWrnbMybQQlOhhBevdPAX/EUUFGkqM/cjVnoFQjjFUav4SN5 HmR8C8Zd+uy0lh/yU3c7wRMSWGzz9PQbcV8R64UUox7mnQJ7F/xZLT5MTKUpQu3NAaO2jf zkHvYsK+lafOCIGbYBuSBM9TQen7kr4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-525-ynNat_p8N7CAl3fqjjFTMQ-1; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:36:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ynNat_p8N7CAl3fqjjFTMQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232368015C6; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.137] (ovpn-116-137.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.137]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3780F5C1C2; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 96/99] tests/qtest: split the cdrom-test into arm/aarch64 To: Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Richard Henderson References: <20210604155312.15902-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20210604155312.15902-97-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <87im2ol8xu.fsf@linaro.org> <3cef0694-0c9c-e0d8-2c30-86dc6978db4d@redhat.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: <067a2f68-1520-29be-6463-9a27a12a96ce@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:36:00 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3cef0694-0c9c-e0d8-2c30-86dc6978db4d@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jsnow@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=jsnow@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.197, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Laurent Vivier , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "open list:IDE" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 6/8/21 11:01 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 08/06/2021 16.27, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Richard Henderson writes: >> >>> On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit >>>> machines is about to be broken... >>> >>> Um, what? >> >> Really what we want is to probe the -M (machines) that a binary >> supports rather than just barfing the test because we've built a QEMU >> that doesn't support all the random 32 bit machines. >> >>> r~ >>> >>> >>> >>>   and besides it's not likely this is >>>> improving out coverage by much. Test the "virt" machine for both arm >>>> and aarch64 as it can be used by either architecture. >> >> I think this point still stands though, I don't think we get much from >> running the cdrom test with realview et all on qemu-system-aarch64. > > In a lot of CI pipelines, we are either building aarch64 or arm, but not > both, so I think it might be good to keep the tests in here. > >  Thomas > I'm deferring to Thomas on this -- it has just a little bit less to do with the CDROM itself and more to do with machine configuration, which I consider outside of my wheelhouse here. --js