From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb1M0-00029m-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:46:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb1Lw-0005YV-V3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:46:56 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:45440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb1Lw-0005Ws-LT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:46:52 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0F9jViw091439 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:46:50 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fgm7ymetv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:46:49 -0500 Received: from localhost by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 02:46:48 -0700 From: Daniel Henrique Barboza References: <20171205133508.15061-1-danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <34e2e5fd-ed31-ebcd-e610-10ef62557aca@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:46:41 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <34e2e5fd-ed31-ebcd-e610-10ef62557aca@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-US Message-Id: <06809f02-dd3a-bbf8-cec1-016367e01e71@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/1] savevm/loadvm with postcopy flag qemu-iotest List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: Kevin Wolf , Cleber Rosa , Max Reitz Ping On 01/02/2018 11:04 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > Hi there, > > I saw that new iotests were added upstream and decided to re-sent this=20 > patch, but > then I noticed that the files being created by this patch (201 and=20 > 201.out) weren't > created upstream - we have 200 and then 202 and 203. > > Is this patch queued somewhere to be added or should I re-send it anywa= y? > > > Thanks, > > > Daniel > > > On 12/05/2017 11:35 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> Changes from v4: >> - added a 'refcount_bits=3D1' constraint for internal snapshots >> >> Changes from v3: >> - rebased with master - file name changed from 198 to 201 >> - removed Creator/owner information (it can be retrieved with git) >> - added a migration successful check before executing savevm >> - removed a trailing double comma in the snapshot name >> >> Daniel Henrique Barboza (1): >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 tests/qemu-iotests: adding savevm/loadvm with postcopy fl= ag test >> >> =C2=A0 tests/qemu-iotests/201=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 | 120=20 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> =C2=A0 tests/qemu-iotests/201.out |=C2=A0 23 +++++++++ >> =C2=A0 tests/qemu-iotests/group=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0=C2=A0 1 + >> =C2=A0 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+) >> =C2=A0 create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/201 >> =C2=A0 create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/201.out >> > >