From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, fam@euphon.net,
mst@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] hw/scsi: avoid deadlock upon TMF request canceling with VirtIO
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:20:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07150a24-d155-49c9-958c-361ea7ae6ced@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251016175857.GA1174862@fedora>
Hi Stefan,
Am 16.10.25 um 8:25 PM schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 03:43:50PM +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> RFC, because it's a naive approach, maybe somebody has a better idea?
>
> Another approach is the one taken in scsi_device_for_each_req_async_bh()
> where requests from this AioContext are collected into a GList and then
> processed after releasing s->requests_lock. It's safe because the
> function runs in the request's AioContext and we know nothing else can
> modify the request while we are running. The same constraint applies in
> this case too.
>
> That solution is more localized because various function prototypes
> don't need to be extended with holds_requests_lock. Either it can be
> open coded inside virtio_scsi_do_tmf_aio_context() or you could extract
> a helper function from scsi_device_for_each_req_async_bh() in scsi-bus.c
> and call the new helper from virtio_scsi_do_tmf_aio_context().
>
> I slightly prefer a localized fix so that other parts of the codebase
> don't need to worry about whether or not requests_lock is held. Do you
> want to try implementing that?
thank you for the suggestion and pointers! I also feel like a localized
solution would be nicer. I'll try this approach.
Kind Regards,
Fiona
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 13:43 [RFC] hw/scsi: avoid deadlock upon TMF request canceling with VirtIO Fiona Ebner
2025-10-16 17:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-10-17 8:20 ` Fiona Ebner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07150a24-d155-49c9-958c-361ea7ae6ced@proxmox.com \
--to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).