From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] string-input-visitor: Support alternate types
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 08:23:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0778f9a5-d974-9beb-ae94-b8e46de7b75d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vaphm4fs.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2285 bytes --]
On 05/04/2017 03:06 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:07:43PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> When parsing alternates from a string, there are some limitations in
>>>> what we can do, but it is a valid use case in some situations. We can
>>>> support booleans, integer types, and enums.
>
> By the way, the same restrictions apply to the "keyval" variant of the
> QObject input visitor. It's a known problem stated here:
>
> Message-ID: <8737exuz6u.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/msg00046.html
>
> However, I failed to document it properly in the source.
>
>>> Begs the question what happens when you violate these restrictions.
>>
>> Right now, we don't detect those cases and behavior is undefined.
>> I think it will be a good idea to give start_alternate() enough
>> information to detect those cases (by adding a 'const char *const
>> enum_table[]' parameter).
>
> Alternate types that won't work with the string input visitor can be
> detected at compile time (by qapi.py), but not their actual use. Pity.
>
> Do we actually use alternates that violate the restrictions? If not, we
> could simply restrict alternates so they work with *all* visitors. If
> we ever run into an actual need for alternates that don't, we'll be no
> worse off than now.
>
> Let's review existing alternates outside tests:
>
> * Qcow2OverlapChecks: struct + enum
> * BlockdevRef: struct + str
> * GuestFileWhence: int + enum (all enum members start with a letter)
>
> Restricting alternates looks practical to me. Eric, what do you think?
As in: we forbid the combination of a scalar (whether 'int', 'number',
'bool', and perhaps 'null') with a plain 'str' (since there's no way to
tell whether '1' should parse as an integer or the string "1"); and
combining a scalar with an 'enum' requires that all enum members be
distinct from what could otherwise be parsed as a scalar? I can live
with such a restriction.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-04 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 20:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] x86: Support "-cpu feature=force" Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-02 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] visitor: Add 'supported_qtypes' parameter to visit_start_alternate() Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-02 21:29 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-02 22:35 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-03 15:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-02 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] string-input-visitor: Support alternate types Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-02 21:37 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-02 22:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-03 16:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-03 18:30 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-04 8:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-04 13:23 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-05-04 13:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-04 14:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-04 19:42 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-04 20:03 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-04 20:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-05 6:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-02 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] tests: Add [+-]feature and feature=on|off test cases Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-02 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86: Support feature=force on the command-line Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-02 20:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fixup! tests: Add [+-]feature and feature=on|off test cases Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-02 21:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86: Support feature=force on the command-line Eric Blake
2017-05-02 22:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-04 9:49 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-05-05 17:21 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-04 10:16 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2017-05-05 17:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-08 10:56 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2017-05-02 20:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] x86: Support "-cpu feature=force" no-reply
2017-05-02 21:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-02 20:47 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0778f9a5-d974-9beb-ae94-b8e46de7b75d@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).