From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Bernhard Beschow" <shentey@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/unit/test-io-channel-command: Silence GCC error "maybe-uninitialized"
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 10:48:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0790f70d-2b8a-ade7-c847-91e856b532dc@vivier.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875yfxkssf.fsf@linaro.org>
Le 02/11/2022 à 21:24, Alex Bennée a écrit :
>
> Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> GCC issues a false positive warning, resulting in build failure with -Werror:
>>
>> In file included from /usr/lib/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h:9,
>> from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtypes.h:34,
>> from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/galloca.h:34,
>> from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:32,
>> from ../src/include/glib-compat.h:32,
>> from ../src/include/qemu/osdep.h:144,
>> from ../src/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c:21:
>> /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h: In function ‘test_io_channel_command_fifo’:
>> /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1333:105: error: ‘dstargv’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> 1333 | static G_GNUC_UNUSED inline void _GLIB_AUTO_FUNC_NAME(TypeName) (TypeName *_ptr) { if (*_ptr != none) (func) (*_ptr); } \
>> | ^
>> ../src/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c:39:19: note: ‘dstargv’ was declared here
>> 39 | g_auto(GStrv) dstargv;
>> | ^~~~~~~
>> /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1333:105: error: ‘srcargv’ may
>> be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> 1333 | static G_GNUC_UNUSED inline void
>> _GLIB_AUTO_FUNC_NAME(TypeName) (TypeName *_ptr) { if (*_ptr != none)
>> (func) (*_ptr); } \
>> | ^
>> ../src/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c:38:19: note: ‘srcargv’ was declared here
>> 38 | g_auto(GStrv) srcargv;
>> | ^~~~~~~
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> GCC version:
>>
>> $ gcc --version
>> gcc (GCC) 12.2.0
>>
>> Fixes: 68406d10859385c88da73d0106254a7f47e6652e ('tests/unit: cleanups for test-io-channel-command')
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c b/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c
>> index 43e29c8cfb..ba0717d3c3 100644
>> --- a/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c
>> +++ b/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c
>> @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ static void test_io_channel_command_fifo(bool async)
>> g_autofree gchar *fifo = g_strdup_printf("%s/%s", tmpdir, TEST_FIFO);
>> g_autoptr(GString) srcargs = g_string_new(socat);
>> g_autoptr(GString) dstargs = g_string_new(socat);
>> - g_auto(GStrv) srcargv;
>> - g_auto(GStrv) dstargv;
>> + g_auto(GStrv) srcargv = NULL;
>> + g_auto(GStrv) dstargv = NULL;
>> QIOChannel *src, *dst;
>> QIOChannelTest *test;
>
> Another approach would be to drop the GString usage which is premature
> and then we can allocate everything in order:
Yes, it looks like a better approach. I'm going to drop this patch from the trivial branch.
Could you send a patch?
Thanks,
Laurent
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> modified tests/unit/test-io-channel-command.c
> @@ -33,19 +33,13 @@ static void test_io_channel_command_fifo(bool async)
> {
> g_autofree gchar *tmpdir = g_dir_make_tmp("qemu-test-io-channel.XXXXXX", NULL);
> g_autofree gchar *fifo = g_strdup_printf("%s/%s", tmpdir, TEST_FIFO);
> - g_autoptr(GString) srcargs = g_string_new(socat);
> - g_autoptr(GString) dstargs = g_string_new(socat);
> - g_auto(GStrv) srcargv;
> - g_auto(GStrv) dstargv;
> + g_autofree gchar *srcargs = g_strdup_printf("%s - PIPE:%s,wronly", socat, fifo);
> + g_autofree gchar *dstargs = g_strdup_printf("%s PIPE:%s,rdonly -", socat, fifo);
> + g_auto(GStrv) srcargv = g_strsplit(srcargs, " ", -1);
> + g_auto(GStrv) dstargv = g_strsplit(dstargs, " ", -1);
> QIOChannel *src, *dst;
> QIOChannelTest *test;
>
> - g_string_append_printf(srcargs, " - PIPE:%s,wronly", fifo);
> - g_string_append_printf(dstargs, " PIPE:%s,rdonly -", fifo);
> -
> - srcargv = g_strsplit(srcargs->str, " ", -1);
> - dstargv = g_strsplit(dstargs->str, " ", -1);
> -
> src = QIO_CHANNEL(qio_channel_command_new_spawn((const char **) srcargv,
> O_WRONLY,
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-03 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 21:39 [PATCH] tests/unit/test-io-channel-command: Silence GCC error "maybe-uninitialized" Bernhard Beschow
2022-11-02 6:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-02 6:50 ` Bin Meng
2022-11-02 17:55 ` Laurent Vivier
2022-11-02 20:24 ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-03 9:48 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0790f70d-2b8a-ade7-c847-91e856b532dc@vivier.eu \
--to=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=shentey@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).