From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, philmd@redhat.com,
laurent@vivier.eu, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: Improve alias attribute check
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 10:36:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0798e22b-4aed-7f72-5e77-4520d9cc010b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <107a73a0-aafe-bfce-7c28-8ed5fe6c022f@linaro.org>
Hi Paolo and Richard,
On 3/21/21 9:33 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 3/20/21 11:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> +int main(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return read_y();
>>> +}
>>
>> I think this should be "read_y() == 1 ? 0 : 1".
>
> As a testcase returning 0 on success, yes.
>
Ok. I will include the changes in v2. Also, I will
wrap the lines, for example:
int main(void) { return (read_y() == 1) ? 0 : 1; }
if compile_prog "" "" && $TMPE >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
attralias=yes
fi
>> I can reproduce it with -flto -O2 but not without -flto, do you agree?
>
> Agreed. Replicated with a random recent gcc 11 snapshot.
> This is really annoying of lto. It's clear something needs to change though.
>
The command I used is:
gcc -O2 -flto=auto config-temp.c config-temp-b.c -o config-temp.exe.
Removing "-O2" or "-flto=auto" can make the gcc alias attribute workable again.
>> Perhaps we can obtain the same optimization by wrapping reads of the page size in an inline __attribute__((const)) function. Richard, what do you think?
>
> I'll give it a shot and see what happens.
>
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-20 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-20 4:27 [PATCH] configure: Improve alias attribute check Gavin Shan
2021-03-20 4:48 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-20 23:32 ` Gavin Shan
2021-03-20 17:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-20 22:33 ` Richard Henderson
2021-03-20 23:36 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2021-03-21 15:49 ` Richard Henderson
2021-03-21 16:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-21 17:34 ` Richard Henderson
2021-03-21 17:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-21 17:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-21 18:23 ` Richard Henderson
2021-03-22 10:54 ` Gavin Shan
2021-03-22 20:59 ` Richard Henderson
2021-03-23 3:13 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0798e22b-4aed-7f72-5e77-4520d9cc010b@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).