From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"open list:Network Block Dev..." <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12] nbd/client: Correctly handle bad server REP_META_CONTEXT
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 08:59:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0819f7c2-0657-a996-1761-2b81d594ea61@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84116abb-5af9-a017-898e-435e089d2304@virtuozzo.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4858 bytes --]
On 03/30/2018 11:59 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 30.03.2018 02:18, Eric Blake wrote:
>> It's never a good idea to blindly read for size bytes as
>> returned by the server without first validating that the size
>> is within bounds; a malicious or buggy server could cause us
>> to hang or get out of sync from reading further messages.
>>
>> It may be smarter to try and teach the client to cope with
>> unexpected context ids by silently ignoring them instead of
>> hanging up on the server, but for now, if the server doesn't
>> reply with exactly the one context we expect, it's easier to
>> just give up - however, if we give up for any reason other
>> than an I/O failure, we might as well try to politely tell
>> the server we are quitting rather than continuing.
>> @@ -651,6 +651,14 @@ static int
>> nbd_negotiate_simple_meta_context(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> char *name;
>> size_t len;
>>
>> + if (reply.length != sizeof(received_id) + context_len) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to negotiate meta context '%s',
>> server "
>> + "answered with unexpected length %u", context,
>
> uint32_t, is it worth PRIu32 ? Or %u is absolutely portable in this case?
For trace-events, casting uint32_t to unsigned int is always safe, at
which point using %u is less typing (because the trace goes through a
function prototype conversion). But when directly printing a uint32_t,
you are correct that some oddball 32-bit platforms might have uint32_t
be long, which would then trigger needless warnings if we don't use
PRIu32. So I'll fix that.
>
>> + reply.length);
>> + nbd_send_opt_abort(ioc);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>
> hmm, after this check, len variable is not actually needed, we can use
> context_len
>
Okay, I'm squashing this in:
diff --git i/nbd/client.c w/nbd/client.c
index 4ee1d9a4a2c..dd0174b036e 100644
--- i/nbd/client.c
+++ w/nbd/client.c
@@ -649,11 +649,10 @@ static int
nbd_negotiate_simple_meta_context(QIOChannel *ioc,
if (reply.type == NBD_REP_META_CONTEXT) {
char *name;
- size_t len;
if (reply.length != sizeof(received_id) + context_len) {
error_setg(errp, "Failed to negotiate meta context '%s',
server "
- "answered with unexpected length %u", context,
+ "answered with unexpected length %" PRIu32, context,
reply.length);
nbd_send_opt_abort(ioc);
return -1;
@@ -664,13 +663,13 @@ static int
nbd_negotiate_simple_meta_context(QIOChannel *ioc,
}
be32_to_cpus(&received_id);
- len = reply.length - sizeof(received_id);
- name = g_malloc(len + 1);
- if (nbd_read(ioc, name, len, errp) < 0) {
+ reply.length -= sizeof(received_id);
+ name = g_malloc(reply.length + 1);
+ if (nbd_read(ioc, name, reply.length, errp) < 0) {
g_free(name);
return -1;
}
- name[len] = '\0';
+ name[reply.length] = '\0';
if (strcmp(context, name)) {
error_setg(errp, "Failed to negotiate meta context '%s',
server "
"answered with different context '%s'", context,
>> @@ -690,6 +699,12 @@ static int
>> nbd_negotiate_simple_meta_context(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> if (reply.type != NBD_REP_ACK) {
>> error_setg(errp, "Unexpected reply type %" PRIx32 " expected
>> %x",
>> reply.type, NBD_REP_ACK);
>> + nbd_send_opt_abort(ioc);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + if (reply.length) {
>
> this check is very common for REP_ACK, it may be better to move it to
> nbd_handle_reply_err... (and rename this function? and combine it
> somehow with _option_request() and _option_reply()?)
>
>> + error_setg(errp, "Unexpected length to ACK response");
>> + nbd_send_opt_abort(ioc);
>
> hmm, looks like we want nbd_send_opt_abort() before most of return -1.
> Looks like it lacks some generalization, may be want to send it at some
> common point..
>
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>
> mostly, just ideas for future refactoring, so:
Indeed, any refactoring we do in that area belongs in 2.13 patches.
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Thanks; I'm including this in my NBD pull request today.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-29 23:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12] nbd/client: Correctly handle bad server REP_META_CONTEXT Eric Blake
2018-03-30 16:59 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-04-02 13:59 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2018-03-31 7:44 ` no-reply
2018-03-31 9:05 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0819f7c2-0657-a996-1761-2b81d594ea61@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).