From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: John Levon <john.levon@nutanix.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Tony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Rosato" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, "Tomita Moeko" <tomitamoeko@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"Jason Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Eric Farman" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
"John Johnson" <john.g.johnson@oracle.com>,
"Elena Ufimtseva" <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>,
"Jagannathan Raman" <jag.raman@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] vfio: add vfio-pci-base class
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:46:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08d7eb98-4d0c-419a-b143-88b7852a62a5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAqyga6DrXMBU2S-@lent>
On 4/24/25 23:52, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:17:28PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> CAUTION: External Email
>>
>> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
>>
>> On 4/9/25 15:48, John Levon wrote:
>>> Split out parts of TYPE_VFIO_PCI into a base TYPE_VFIO_PCI_BASE. The
>>> base type contains properties generic to all vfio-pci implementations
>>> (although we have not yet introduced another subclass).
>>>
>>> Note that currently there is no need for additional data for
>>> TYPE_VFIO_PCI, so it shares the same C struct type as
>>> TYPE_VFIO_PCI_BASE, VFIOPCIDevice.
>>
>> I don't understand how the properties are distributed between the
>> abstract vfio-pci base class and the vfio-pci class. What's the
>> rationale ?
>
> It's for properties that apply to all vfio pci classes, and those that are
> specific to the kernel vfio pci implementation.
It seems quite vague to me.
After this patch, here is what we have for the base class :
static const Property vfio_pci_base_dev_properties[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_ON_OFF_AUTO("x-pre-copy-dirty-page-tracking", VFIOPCIDevice,
vbasedev.pre_copy_dirty_page_tracking,
ON_OFF_AUTO_ON),
DEFINE_PROP_ON_OFF_AUTO("x-device-dirty-page-tracking", VFIOPCIDevice,
vbasedev.device_dirty_page_tracking,
ON_OFF_AUTO_ON),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-intx-mmap-timeout-ms", VFIOPCIDevice,
intx.mmap_timeout, 1100),
DEFINE_PROP_ON_OFF_AUTO("enable-migration", VFIOPCIDevice,
vbasedev.enable_migration, ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO),
DEFINE_PROP("x-migration-multifd-transfer", VFIOPCIDevice,
vbasedev.migration_multifd_transfer,
vfio_pci_migration_multifd_transfer_prop, OnOffAuto,
.set_default = true, .defval.i = ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("migration-events", VFIOPCIDevice,
vbasedev.migration_events, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-mmap", VFIOPCIDevice, vbasedev.no_mmap, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-balloon-allowed", VFIOPCIDevice,
vbasedev.ram_block_discard_allowed, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-kvm-intx", VFIOPCIDevice, no_kvm_intx, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-kvm-msi", VFIOPCIDevice, no_kvm_msi, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-kvm-msix", VFIOPCIDevice, no_kvm_msix, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-kvm-ioeventfd", VFIOPCIDevice, no_kvm_ioeventfd,
false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-vfio-ioeventfd", VFIOPCIDevice, no_vfio_ioeventfd,
false),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-pci-vendor-id", VFIOPCIDevice, vendor_id, PCI_ANY_ID),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-pci-device-id", VFIOPCIDevice, device_id, PCI_ANY_ID),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-pci-sub-vendor-id", VFIOPCIDevice,
sub_vendor_id, PCI_ANY_ID),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-pci-sub-device-id", VFIOPCIDevice,
sub_device_id, PCI_ANY_ID),
DEFINE_PROP_OFF_AUTO_PCIBAR("x-msix-relocation", VFIOPCIDevice, msix_relo,
OFF_AUTO_PCIBAR_OFF),
};
and for vfio-pci :
static const Property vfio_pci_dev_properties[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_PCI_HOST_DEVADDR("host", VFIOPCIDevice, host),
DEFINE_PROP_UUID_NODEFAULT("vf-token", VFIOPCIDevice, vf_token),
DEFINE_PROP_STRING("sysfsdev", VFIOPCIDevice, vbasedev.sysfsdev),
DEFINE_PROP_ON_OFF_AUTO("display", VFIOPCIDevice,
display, ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("xres", VFIOPCIDevice, display_xres, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("yres", VFIOPCIDevice, display_yres, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-vga", VFIOPCIDevice, features,
VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_VGA_BIT, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-req", VFIOPCIDevice, features,
VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_REQ_BIT, true),
DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-igd-opregion", VFIOPCIDevice, features,
VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_IGD_OPREGION_BIT, false),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-igd-gms", VFIOPCIDevice, igd_gms, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-igd-lpc", VFIOPCIDevice, features,
VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_IGD_LPC_BIT, false),
DEFINE_PROP_ON_OFF_AUTO("x-igd-legacy-mode", VFIOPCIDevice,
igd_legacy_mode, ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-geforce-quirks", VFIOPCIDevice,
no_geforce_quirks, false),
DEFINE_PROP_UNSIGNED_NODEFAULT("x-nv-gpudirect-clique", VFIOPCIDevice,
nv_gpudirect_clique,
qdev_prop_nv_gpudirect_clique, uint8_t),
#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMUFD
DEFINE_PROP_LINK("iommufd", VFIOPCIDevice, vbasedev.iommufd,
TYPE_IOMMUFD_BACKEND, IOMMUFDBackend *),
#endif
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("skip-vsc-check", VFIOPCIDevice, skip_vsc_check, true),
};
Graphic property and host device definitions are excluded from the
base class it seems. This might fit vfio-user needs but it looks
like a quick hack from the vfio-pci side. It needs more work.
>> Can you remind me why the vfio-pci class for vfio-user can not
>> inherit directly from vfio-pci ?
>
> For the above reason: we'd inherit many properties that don't work for
> vfio-user.
What do you mean by "don't work" ? functionally irrelevant ?
Thanks,
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 13:48 [PATCH 00/14] vfio: preparation for vfio-user John Levon
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 01/14] vfio: refactor out vfio_interrupt_setup() John Levon
2025-04-23 12:20 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 02/14] vfio: refactor out vfio_pci_config_setup() John Levon
2025-04-09 15:38 ` Tomita Moeko
2025-04-09 15:41 ` John Levon
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 03/14] vfio: add vfio_prepare_device() John Levon
2025-04-23 12:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-23 13:19 ` John Levon
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 04/14] vfio: add vfio_attach_device_by_iommu_type() John Levon
2025-04-23 13:25 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 05/14] vfio/container: pass listener_begin/commit callbacks John Levon
2025-04-23 13:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-24 16:24 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-24 16:28 ` John Levon
2025-04-24 16:35 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 06/14] vfio: add flags parameter to DMA unmap callback John Levon
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 07/14] vfio: specify VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_ALL to callback John Levon
2025-04-23 17:01 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-23 17:17 ` John Levon
2025-04-24 17:16 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-24 19:35 ` John Levon
2025-04-28 11:41 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 08/14] vfio: add vfio-pci-base class John Levon
2025-04-24 15:17 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-24 21:52 ` John Levon
2025-04-25 12:46 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2025-04-25 13:01 ` John Levon
2025-04-28 12:53 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 09/14] vfio: add vfio_device_get_irq_info() helper John Levon
2025-04-23 17:16 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 10/14] vfio: consistently handle return value for helpers John Levon
2025-04-24 15:19 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 11/14] vfio: add vfio_pci_config_space_read/write() John Levon
2025-04-09 15:51 ` Tomita Moeko
2025-04-09 15:54 ` John Levon
2025-04-09 16:30 ` Tomita Moeko
2025-04-24 15:59 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-24 16:06 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 12/14] vfio: add region info cache John Levon
2025-04-24 16:08 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-24 16:26 ` John Levon
2025-04-28 15:16 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-28 15:26 ` John Levon
2025-04-28 15:39 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-28 16:09 ` John Levon
2025-04-29 22:41 ` John Levon
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 13/14] vfio: add device IO ops vector John Levon
2025-04-24 16:18 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/container: pass MemoryRegion to DMA operations John Levon
2025-04-24 16:32 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-24 17:49 ` John Levon
2025-04-25 7:59 ` [PATCH 00/14] vfio: preparation for vfio-user Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08d7eb98-4d0c-419a-b143-88b7852a62a5@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jag.raman@oracle.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.johnson@oracle.com \
--cc=john.levon@nutanix.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tomitamoeko@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).