From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>,
Bug 1925496 <1925496@bugs.launchpad.net>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 1925496] Re: nvme disk cannot be hotplugged after removal
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:00:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09273f4c-3ac6-1fc4-b26e-d6fd3bee9021@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIk1KG4dgT6mwChA@apples.localdomain>
On 28.04.21 12:12, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Apr 28 09:31, Oguz Bektas wrote:
>>> My understanding is that this is the expected behavior. The reason is
>>> that the drive cannot be deleted immediately when the device is
>>> hot-unplugged, since it might not be safe (other parts of QEMU could
>>> be using it, like background block jobs).
>>>
>>> On the other hand, the fact that if the drive is removed explicitly
>>> through QMP (or in the monitor with drive_del), the drive id is
>>> remains "in use". This might be a completely different bug that is
>>> unrelated to the nvme device.
>>
>> using the same commands I can hot-plug and hot-unplug a scsi disk like
>> this without issue - this behavior only appeared on nvme devices.
>>
>
> Kevin, Max, can you shed any light on this?
>
> Specifically what the expected behavior is wrt. to the drive when
> unplugging a device that has one attached?
>
> If the scsi disk is capable of "cleaning up" immediately, then I suppose
> that some steps are missing in the nvme unrealization.
I’m not very strong when it comes to question for guest devices, but
looking into the QAPI documentation, it says that when DEVICE_DELETED is
emitted, it’s safe to reuse the device ID. Before then, it isn’t,
because the guest may yet need to release the device.
So the questions that come to my mind are:
- Do nvme guest devices have a release protocol with the guest, so that
it just may take some time for the guest to release the device? I.e.
that this would be perfectly normal and documented behavior?
(Perhaps this just isn’t the case for scsi, or the guest just releases
those devices much quicker)
- Did Oguz always wait for the DEVICE_DELETED event before reusing the
ID? Sounds like it would be a bug if reusing the ID after getting that
event failed.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 12:34 [Bug 1925496] [NEW] nvme disk cannot be hotplugged after removal Oguz Bektas
2021-04-22 12:55 ` [Bug 1925496] " Klaus Jensen
2021-04-22 13:38 ` Oguz Bektas
2021-04-22 14:24 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-04-26 9:31 ` Oguz Bektas
2021-04-28 7:38 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-04-28 9:31 ` Oguz Bektas
2021-04-28 10:12 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-04-28 13:00 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2021-05-03 7:27 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-05-11 7:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-18 4:32 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-16 14:54 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09273f4c-3ac6-1fc4-b26e-d6fd3bee9021@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=1925496@bugs.launchpad.net \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).