From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grS19-0001EW-Vp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:33:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grS19-00025E-9S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:33:51 -0500 References: <20190206165342.219192-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20190206165342.219192-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <608f7ff7-7b3c-939a-7bdb-852f63f4828e@redhat.com> <6cf6c085-3a28-0a7c-75b2-79f181e3ca6e@virtuozzo.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <09e2ef0f-7bda-4ad1-c583-b25e5d75a738@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12:33:39 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6cf6c085-3a28-0a7c-75b2-79f181e3ca6e@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vW30fqJdEo9rq5mwDgDLKqUeVEoi79K7c" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block/io: use qemu_iovec_init_buf List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "qemu-block@nongnu.org" Cc: "mreitz@redhat.com" , "kwolf@redhat.com" , "fam@euphon.net" , "stefanha@redhat.com" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vW30fqJdEo9rq5mwDgDLKqUeVEoi79K7c From: Eric Blake To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "qemu-block@nongnu.org" Cc: "mreitz@redhat.com" , "kwolf@redhat.com" , "fam@euphon.net" , "stefanha@redhat.com" Message-ID: <09e2ef0f-7bda-4ad1-c583-b25e5d75a738@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] block/io: use qemu_iovec_init_buf References: <20190206165342.219192-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20190206165342.219192-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <608f7ff7-7b3c-939a-7bdb-852f63f4828e@redhat.com> <6cf6c085-3a28-0a7c-75b2-79f181e3ca6e@virtuozzo.com> In-Reply-To: <6cf6c085-3a28-0a7c-75b2-79f181e3ca6e@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/6/19 12:26 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >>> shows a lot of, exactly 34 after io.c already updated. >>> They are in different subsystems, so I think it should be simpler to = push this >>> one as a precedent and example, and then send separate patches (or se= ries) >>> per-maintainer. >> >> Most are block related, so getting it in through the block maintainers= >> is probably the easiest - but you ARE right that one patch per one or >> two files or two is going to be smartest (otherwise, it gets too big).= >> >> I'd group qed-table.c and qed.c; and the two hw/ide/ files; resulting = in >> 14 more patches to go. >> >=20 > So, you, think better is to make one common patch set? Ok, I'll do (hmm= or start doing) > it tomorrow as v3 if no other opinions. Yes, a v3 series of 16 patches for the entire conversion, and cc: qemu-block, should be sufficient. Looking forward to seeing v3. --=20 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org --vW30fqJdEo9rq5mwDgDLKqUeVEoi79K7c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEccLMIrHEYCkn0vOqp6FrSiUnQ2oFAlxbKIMACgkQp6FrSiUn Q2qhxAf+Jc+bkXYkq5f+ql2MjjBumNRnFc8w9dMPiFWmFoPCjItlvXlV1WkMCjxd uK5CS0KZ8xOplJ8eLR4mHgqn8Kls2xiQw0PGFL2tNHQR4h8ALjqukz5OF8sp7GFu VD/Xbfi/rnKOViHOzafR+srmxrAuGNTBbh9DkUKfrGK7OzCmYObh4AePSt/NfSpH wUAQSrjJPLVmRKwQvCFEovS84TNR73eala1QQvciSz62PEIb3GqZLWsYQUTrF2Vq 6+xD+34SwuOf8vRBoWUbmnW85nps0NMLcB+GCR/LovcGyejdoNvuKvMyfXbRwwVu DEPhR6PLpcrQdJUs28aa7emZpLBbBw== =lus5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vW30fqJdEo9rq5mwDgDLKqUeVEoi79K7c--