From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F79EC433F5 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45010 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzONs-00068l-ET for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:31:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzMVr-0008NR-A0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:31:51 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:50318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzMVk-00041U-Tk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:31:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1640021500; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HtughHq2ZhD5Bv6iiwCH05mp84Mo4y1Q3DIdbj6f07M=; b=Di1BnEP9wB0uNmc+Ldpg1DZeiaLbf5p9bLsXvxhEUe/x4pKGxvwobEzUu3svAyVxjIqoHF M7bBO85q3PScbSNBW6UAoshESv76R2kSU+oKiy7PmcPA126ZxxKfURQrEEq2T1kgO7C1AB bR4UVRtnK0QwykDr72xo5d0HGH2SwbM= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-245-9so3voNgOgmwO1BPnT4H9A-1; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:31:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 9so3voNgOgmwO1BPnT4H9A-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id y17-20020a056402271100b003f7ef5ca612so8133956edd.17 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:31:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HtughHq2ZhD5Bv6iiwCH05mp84Mo4y1Q3DIdbj6f07M=; b=5xFP8gQAQ1+m+7DQPOdOuzoIcdl2ik4ePlOz1N60W1SBNxJPwhuOdW52vtfLFdnDc4 KPxhccAR6r72VfbE2un8eCOds7e/ma7cBkvubRIfivdOnqN3mXVHJrvBnYuNziEaHF9u Detra5JSPWAmWx/uSVWzSJ2ehCaKu/Ve/F9feClbkP7ZM4XM6JcEMs3L6oPR3Kgx3JAk jaxr/sxSSN4YSTVqbc0TNZA/keGOeQNWR7CkaOexnJyISwvKmWCpaHsN7lu3PETHeMIY yV+mi2WXt4eJ2sypb3raNGxJL4c55uqEUWbwtqaHNOz3pfHI6o4DgD3cYhj/3fCwSxUS EIgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lj+l28HS2gRM6xQTHTmsttvsStlLc8C9EEQCwISsvsyQZ47vf NnOID7MHbX5VGM5mNr4Hdmb/H9Rn0XTr8QscEIpXeW3ysK9tXBOSX2AEDYMbBDRSaiW/fUW2ShF /lkfk1MaSf6ZFMSc= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c78f:: with SMTP id n15mr16858991eds.344.1640021498009; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:31:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZRZr1sQ7fqLMHK/+z0Winnp81l9R7l5sl0j/0SkNokO90HXiEynYZcBGNpidQYm9uuc58ag== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c78f:: with SMTP id n15mr16858966eds.344.1640021497738; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:31:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (174.red-83-50-185.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.50.185.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm7217811edb.89.2021.12.20.09.31.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:31:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0a830f15-bdca-02b2-d36d-2063e31c5e75@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:31:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] MAINTAINERS: split out s390x sections To: Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org References: <20211220115419.308463-1-cohuck@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= In-Reply-To: <20211220115419.308463-1-cohuck@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=philmd@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -59 X-Spam_score: -6.0 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.608, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , David Hildenbrand , Richard Henderson , Eric Farman , Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 12/20/21 12:54, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Split out some more specialized devices etc., so that we can build > smarter lists of people to be put on cc: in the future. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck > --- > > As discussed offlist. Some notes: > - The new sections have inherited the maintainers of the sections > they have been split out of (except where people had already > volunteered). That's easy to change, obviously, and I hope that > the cc: list already contains people who might have interest in > volunteering for some sections. > - I may not have gotten the F: patterns correct, please double check. > - I'm also not sure about where in the MAINTAINERS file the new > sections should go; if you have a better idea, please speak up. > - Also, if you have better ideas regarding the sections, please > speak up as well :) > - Pull requests will probably continue the same way as now (i.e. > patches picked up at the top level and then sent, except for some > things like tcg which may go separately.) Not sure if it would > make sense to try out the submaintainer pull request model again, > I don't think it made life easier in the past, and now we have > the b4 tool to pick patches easily anyway. It might be a good > idea to check which of the tree locations should stay, or if we > want to have new ones. > > --- > MAINTAINERS | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé