From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] qapi/expr.py: Consolidate check_if_str calls in check_if
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:34:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b9b080e-afda-ed57-7dc8-62d0b12c77a2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a6rsb50a.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On 2/25/21 9:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> This is a small rewrite to address some minor style nits.
>>
>> Don't compare against the empty list to check for the empty condition, and
>> move the normalization forward to unify the check on the now-normalized
>> structure.
>>
>> With the check unified, the local nested function isn't needed anymore
>> and can be brought down into the normal flow of the function. With the
>> nesting level changed, shuffle the error strings around a bit to get
>> them to fit in 79 columns.
>>
>> Note: though ifcond is typed as Sequence[str] elsewhere, we *know* that
>> the parser will produce real, bona-fide lists. It's okay to check
>> isinstance(ifcond, list) here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/qapi/expr.py | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/expr.py b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> index df6c64950fa..3235a3b809e 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> @@ -128,30 +128,26 @@ def check_flags(expr: Expression, info: QAPISourceInfo) -> None:
>>
>> def check_if(expr: _JSObject, info: QAPISourceInfo, source: str) -> None:
>>
>> - def check_if_str(ifcond: object) -> None:
>> - if not isinstance(ifcond, str):
>> - raise QAPISemError(
>> - info,
>> - "'if' condition of %s must be a string or a list of strings"
>> - % source)
>> - if ifcond.strip() == '':
>> - raise QAPISemError(
>> - info,
>> - "'if' condition '%s' of %s makes no sense"
>> - % (ifcond, source))
>> -
>> ifcond = expr.get('if')
>> if ifcond is None:
>> return
>> - if isinstance(ifcond, list):
>> - if ifcond == []:
>> +
>> + # Normalize to a list
>> + if not isinstance(ifcond, list):
>> + ifcond = [ifcond]
>> + expr['if'] = ifcond
>> +
>> + if not ifcond:
>> + raise QAPISemError(info, f"'if' condition [] of {source} is useless")
>
> In the old code, the connection between the conditional and the error
> message was a bit more obvious.
>
I will admit to that being true.
Do you think it's still worth the change? I do need to get rid of the
comparison against "[]", the rest was just "Ah, while I'm here, ..." and
I thought it was nice to get rid of the nested function.
(I think it's still worth it.)
>> +
>> + for element in ifcond:
>
> @element is rather long. If you hate @elt, what about @ifc?
>
Hate's a strong word, It just wasn't obvious to me at the time. I
decided to expand it to what you said it stood for.
I can undo that if you are attached to 'elt', but I don't share the view
that 'element' is somehow burdensomely long.
>> + if not isinstance(element, str):
>> + raise QAPISemError(info, (
>> + f"'if' condition of {source}"
>> + " must be a string or a list of strings"))
>> + if element.strip() == '':
>> raise QAPISemError(
>> - info, "'if' condition [] of %s is useless" % source)
>> - for elt in ifcond:
>> - check_if_str(elt)
>> - else:
>> - check_if_str(ifcond)
>> - expr['if'] = [ifcond]
>> + info, f"'if' condition '{element}' of {source} makes no sense")
>>
>>
>> def normalize_members(members: object) -> None:
>
> Perhaps:
>
> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/expr.py b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
> index df6c64950f..e904924599 100644
> --- a/scripts/qapi/expr.py
> +++ b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
> @@ -128,30 +128,26 @@ def check_flags(expr: Expression, info: QAPISourceInfo) -> None:
>
> def check_if(expr: _JSObject, info: QAPISourceInfo, source: str) -> None:
>
> - def check_if_str(ifcond: object) -> None:
> - if not isinstance(ifcond, str):
> - raise QAPISemError(
> - info,
> - "'if' condition of %s must be a string or a list of strings"
> - % source)
> - if ifcond.strip() == '':
> - raise QAPISemError(
> - info,
> - "'if' condition '%s' of %s makes no sense"
> - % (ifcond, source))
> -
> ifcond = expr.get('if')
> if ifcond is None:
> return
> +
> if isinstance(ifcond, list):
> if ifcond == []:
Should be "if not ifcond", though I suppose pylint does not actually
whine about this. Guido lives in my head rent-free.
> raise QAPISemError(
> info, "'if' condition [] of %s is useless" % source)
> - for elt in ifcond:
> - check_if_str(elt)
> else:
> - check_if_str(ifcond)
> - expr['if'] = [ifcond]
> + # Normalize to a list
> + ifcond = expr['if'] = [ifcond]
You know, I didn't actually know this worked in Python, because I didn't
think "x = 3" was an expression that had a value. I thought that was the
entire reason they added the := operator in Python 3.8.
Neat, I guess.
> +
> + for elt in ifcond:
> + if not isinstance(elt, str):
> + raise QAPISemError(info, (
> + f"'if' condition of {source}"
> + " must be a string or a list of strings"))
> + if elt.strip() == '':
> + raise QAPISemError(
> + info, f"'if' condition '{elt}' of {source} makes no sense")
>
>
> def normalize_members(members: object) -> None:
>
>
> Bonus: slightly less churn.
>
Looks OK, I'll test with it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-25 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 0:33 [PATCH v3 00/16] qapi: static typing conversion, pt3 John Snow
2021-02-23 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] qapi/expr.py: Remove 'info' argument from nested check_if_str John Snow
2021-02-23 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] qapi/expr.py: Check for dict instead of OrderedDict John Snow
2021-02-24 9:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 21:23 ` John Snow
2021-02-25 10:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 20:04 ` John Snow
2021-03-01 16:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] qapi/expr.py: constrain incoming expression types John Snow
2021-02-24 10:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 21:46 ` John Snow
2021-02-25 11:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 20:43 ` John Snow
2021-03-02 5:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] qapi/expr.py: Add assertion for union type 'check_dict' John Snow
2021-02-24 10:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 21:54 ` John Snow
2021-03-24 21:09 ` John Snow
2021-03-25 5:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-25 19:42 ` John Snow
2021-02-23 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] qapi/expr.py: move string check upwards in check_type John Snow
2021-02-23 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] qapi/expr.py: Check type of 'data' member John Snow
2021-02-24 10:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 22:06 ` John Snow
2021-02-25 12:02 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] qapi/expr.py: Add casts in a few select cases John Snow
2021-02-24 12:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 22:24 ` John Snow
2021-02-25 12:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 22:10 ` John Snow
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] qapi/expr.py: add type hint annotations John Snow
2021-02-24 15:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 22:30 ` John Snow
2021-02-25 12:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 13:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 20:54 ` John Snow
2021-03-02 5:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] qapi/expr.py: Consolidate check_if_str calls in check_if John Snow
2021-02-25 14:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 21:34 ` John Snow [this message]
2021-03-02 5:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] qapi/expr.py: Remove single-letter variable John Snow
2021-02-25 14:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 21:56 ` John Snow
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] qapi/expr.py: enable pylint checks John Snow
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] qapi/expr.py: Add docstrings John Snow
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] qapi/expr.py: Modify check_keys to accept any Collection John Snow
2021-02-25 15:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] qapi/expr.py: Use tuples instead of lists for static data John Snow
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] qapi/expr.py: move related checks inside check_xxx functions John Snow
2021-02-25 15:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-25 5:17 ` John Snow
2021-03-25 13:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23 0:34 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] qapi/expr.py: Use an expression checker dispatch table John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b9b080e-afda-ed57-7dc8-62d0b12c77a2@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).