qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] qapi/expr.py: Consolidate check_if_str calls in check_if
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:34:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b9b080e-afda-ed57-7dc8-62d0b12c77a2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a6rsb50a.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On 2/25/21 9:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> This is a small rewrite to address some minor style nits.
>>
>> Don't compare against the empty list to check for the empty condition, and
>> move the normalization forward to unify the check on the now-normalized
>> structure.
>>
>> With the check unified, the local nested function isn't needed anymore
>> and can be brought down into the normal flow of the function. With the
>> nesting level changed, shuffle the error strings around a bit to get
>> them to fit in 79 columns.
>>
>> Note: though ifcond is typed as Sequence[str] elsewhere, we *know* that
>> the parser will produce real, bona-fide lists. It's okay to check
>> isinstance(ifcond, list) here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   scripts/qapi/expr.py | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/expr.py b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> index df6c64950fa..3235a3b809e 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> @@ -128,30 +128,26 @@ def check_flags(expr: Expression, info: QAPISourceInfo) -> None:
>>   
>>   def check_if(expr: _JSObject, info: QAPISourceInfo, source: str) -> None:
>>   
>> -    def check_if_str(ifcond: object) -> None:
>> -        if not isinstance(ifcond, str):
>> -            raise QAPISemError(
>> -                info,
>> -                "'if' condition of %s must be a string or a list of strings"
>> -                % source)
>> -        if ifcond.strip() == '':
>> -            raise QAPISemError(
>> -                info,
>> -                "'if' condition '%s' of %s makes no sense"
>> -                % (ifcond, source))
>> -
>>       ifcond = expr.get('if')
>>       if ifcond is None:
>>           return
>> -    if isinstance(ifcond, list):
>> -        if ifcond == []:
>> +
>> +    # Normalize to a list
>> +    if not isinstance(ifcond, list):
>> +        ifcond = [ifcond]
>> +        expr['if'] = ifcond
>> +
>> +    if not ifcond:
>> +        raise QAPISemError(info, f"'if' condition [] of {source} is useless")
> 
> In the old code, the connection between the conditional and the error
> message was a bit more obvious.
> 

I will admit to that being true.

Do you think it's still worth the change? I do need to get rid of the 
comparison against "[]", the rest was just "Ah, while I'm here, ..." and 
I thought it was nice to get rid of the nested function.

(I think it's still worth it.)

>> +
>> +    for element in ifcond:
> 
> @element is rather long.  If you hate @elt, what about @ifc?
> 

Hate's a strong word, It just wasn't obvious to me at the time. I 
decided to expand it to what you said it stood for.

I can undo that if you are attached to 'elt', but I don't share the view 
that 'element' is somehow burdensomely long.

>> +        if not isinstance(element, str):
>> +            raise QAPISemError(info, (
>> +                f"'if' condition of {source}"
>> +                " must be a string or a list of strings"))
>> +        if element.strip() == '':
>>               raise QAPISemError(
>> -                info, "'if' condition [] of %s is useless" % source)
>> -        for elt in ifcond:
>> -            check_if_str(elt)
>> -    else:
>> -        check_if_str(ifcond)
>> -        expr['if'] = [ifcond]
>> +                info, f"'if' condition '{element}' of {source} makes no sense")
>>   
>>   
>>   def normalize_members(members: object) -> None:
> 
> Perhaps:
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/expr.py b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
> index df6c64950f..e904924599 100644
> --- a/scripts/qapi/expr.py
> +++ b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
> @@ -128,30 +128,26 @@ def check_flags(expr: Expression, info: QAPISourceInfo) -> None:
>   
>   def check_if(expr: _JSObject, info: QAPISourceInfo, source: str) -> None:
>   
> -    def check_if_str(ifcond: object) -> None:
> -        if not isinstance(ifcond, str):
> -            raise QAPISemError(
> -                info,
> -                "'if' condition of %s must be a string or a list of strings"
> -                % source)
> -        if ifcond.strip() == '':
> -            raise QAPISemError(
> -                info,
> -                "'if' condition '%s' of %s makes no sense"
> -                % (ifcond, source))
> -
>       ifcond = expr.get('if')
>       if ifcond is None:
>           return
> +
>       if isinstance(ifcond, list):
>           if ifcond == []:

Should be "if not ifcond", though I suppose pylint does not actually 
whine about this. Guido lives in my head rent-free.

>               raise QAPISemError(
>                   info, "'if' condition [] of %s is useless" % source)
> -        for elt in ifcond:
> -            check_if_str(elt)
>       else:
> -        check_if_str(ifcond)
> -        expr['if'] = [ifcond]
> +        # Normalize to a list
> +        ifcond = expr['if'] = [ifcond]

You know, I didn't actually know this worked in Python, because I didn't 
think "x = 3" was an expression that had a value. I thought that was the 
entire reason they added the := operator in Python 3.8.

Neat, I guess.

> +
> +    for elt in ifcond:
> +        if not isinstance(elt, str):
> +            raise QAPISemError(info, (
> +                f"'if' condition of {source}"
> +                " must be a string or a list of strings"))
> +        if elt.strip() == '':
> +            raise QAPISemError(
> +                info, f"'if' condition '{elt}' of {source} makes no sense")
>   
>   
>   def normalize_members(members: object) -> None:
> 
> 
> Bonus: slightly less churn.
> 

Looks OK, I'll test with it.



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23  0:33 [PATCH v3 00/16] qapi: static typing conversion, pt3 John Snow
2021-02-23  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] qapi/expr.py: Remove 'info' argument from nested check_if_str John Snow
2021-02-23  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] qapi/expr.py: Check for dict instead of OrderedDict John Snow
2021-02-24  9:30   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 21:23     ` John Snow
2021-02-25 10:40       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 20:04         ` John Snow
2021-03-01 16:48           ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] qapi/expr.py: constrain incoming expression types John Snow
2021-02-24 10:01   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 21:46     ` John Snow
2021-02-25 11:56       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 20:43         ` John Snow
2021-03-02  5:23           ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] qapi/expr.py: Add assertion for union type 'check_dict' John Snow
2021-02-24 10:35   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 21:54     ` John Snow
2021-03-24 21:09     ` John Snow
2021-03-25  5:46       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-25 19:42         ` John Snow
2021-02-23  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] qapi/expr.py: move string check upwards in check_type John Snow
2021-02-23  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] qapi/expr.py: Check type of 'data' member John Snow
2021-02-24 10:39   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 22:06     ` John Snow
2021-02-25 12:02       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] qapi/expr.py: Add casts in a few select cases John Snow
2021-02-24 12:32   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 22:24     ` John Snow
2021-02-25 12:07       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 22:10         ` John Snow
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] qapi/expr.py: add type hint annotations John Snow
2021-02-24 15:27   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-24 22:30     ` John Snow
2021-02-25 12:08       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 13:56   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 20:54     ` John Snow
2021-03-02  5:29       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] qapi/expr.py: Consolidate check_if_str calls in check_if John Snow
2021-02-25 14:23   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 21:34     ` John Snow [this message]
2021-03-02  5:57       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] qapi/expr.py: Remove single-letter variable John Snow
2021-02-25 14:03   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-25 21:56     ` John Snow
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] qapi/expr.py: enable pylint checks John Snow
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] qapi/expr.py: Add docstrings John Snow
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] qapi/expr.py: Modify check_keys to accept any Collection John Snow
2021-02-25 15:41   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] qapi/expr.py: Use tuples instead of lists for static data John Snow
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] qapi/expr.py: move related checks inside check_xxx functions John Snow
2021-02-25 15:28   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-25  5:17     ` John Snow
2021-03-25 13:28       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-23  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] qapi/expr.py: Use an expression checker dispatch table John Snow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b9b080e-afda-ed57-7dc8-62d0b12c77a2@redhat.com \
    --to=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).