Re: [PATCH 03/26] hw/ppc: Avoid using Monitor in xive_tctx_pic_print_info()

[Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>]

Hi Phillipe,

On 6/10/24 11:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index fa23b27a2b..5854358f65 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,13 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>   static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                               Monitor *mon)
>   {
> -    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
> +    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
> +    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
> +
> +    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
> +
> +    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
> +    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
>   }
>   
>   static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_create(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> @@ -1267,7 +1273,13 @@ static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>   static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                                Monitor *mon)
>   {
> -    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
> +    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
> +    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
> +
> +    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
> +
> +    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
> +    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
>   }
>   

We have an existing code duplication in above two routines which is 
getting worse with these multi-lines getting duplicated. Could _power9_ 
be changed to inline and called from _power10_ as well?

Thanks
Harsh