qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <e.emanuelegiuseppe@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] tests/9pfs: refactor test names and test devices
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:38:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cafb215-e49e-902c-4794-bdb696a892d6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9648157.mzsJ5Dm3EP@silver>

On 28/09/20 15:35, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>> As I said, the first two patches make total sense.  They would be useful
>> for testing both packed and split virtqueues, for example.  However, I
>> think the (useful) feature is being misused here.
> 
> I haven't understood why my suggested mult-device use case imposes a misusage, 
> but okay, unless I hear different opinions, I'll prepare a v2 with that (IMO 
> hackish) CL fiddling instead in couple days or so.

Because in my opinion the backend in use is a property of the test
rather than a property of the device.

> @Greg: If that's the way to go, then I probably change the test names, e.g.
> 
> 	"fs/version/basic" -> "synth/version/basic"
> 	...
> 	"fs/create_dir" -> "local/create_dir"
> 
> to be able to easily distinguish 'synth' driver tests from 'local' driver 
> tests, as they would then popup with the same device name in v2, unlike in 
> this v1 where they have separate device names.

Right.

>> Also, looking at future plans for qgraph, adding a generic "plug/socket"
>> mechanism to QOSGraph was an idea that we couldn't do in time for GSoC.
>> With that model, virtio-9p would provide a "socket" of type fsdev and
>> the tests would have to provide a "plug" of the same type.  Likewise
>> there would be sockets of type disk or network.  QOSGraphEdgeOpts fits
>> better with that plan, compared to duplicating the devices.
> 
> Sounds like that would require huge changes for all existing qtests on initial 
> thought at least.

Not huge, but yeah many tests would require changes.

Paolo



  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-28 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-27 10:43 [PATCH 00/12] 9pfs: add tests using local fs driver Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 01/12] tests/qtest/qgraph: add qemu_name to QOSGraphNode Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] tests/qtest/qgraph: add qos_node_create_driver_named() Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] tests/qtest/qos: add qos_dump_graph() Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] tests/qtest/qos-test: new QTEST_DUMP_GRAPH environment variable Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] tests/qtest/qos-test: add QTEST_DUMP_ENV " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] tests/qtest/qos-test: add environment variable QTEST_DEBUG Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28  8:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 12:11     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 07/12] test/9pfs: change export tag name to qtest-synth Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/12] tests/9pfs: refactor test names and test devices Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28  8:36   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28  8:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 11:56     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28 12:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 13:35         ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28 16:38           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-10-01 11:34             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-10-01 11:56               ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-01 12:15                 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-10-01 14:04                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-01 15:26                     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/12] tests/9pfs: introduce local tests Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:41 ` [PATCH 10/12] tests/9pfs: wipe local 9pfs test directory Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] tests/9pfs: add virtio_9p_test_path() Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:41 ` [PATCH 12/12] tests/9pfs: add local Tmkdir test Christian Schoenebeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0cafb215-e49e-902c-4794-bdb696a892d6@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=e.emanuelegiuseppe@gmail.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).