* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options
2017-08-04 14:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options Fam Zheng
@ 2017-08-04 14:42 ` Eric Blake
2017-08-04 15:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Jeff Cody
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Blake @ 2017-08-04 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fam Zheng, qemu-devel; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, Max Reitz, qemu-block
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 767 bytes --]
On 08/04/2017 09:36 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> It's not too surprising when a user specifies the backing file relative
> to the current working directory instead of the top layer image. This
> causes error when they differ. Though the error message has enough
> information to infer the fact about the misunderstanding, it is better
> if we document this explicitly, so that users don't have to learn from
> mistakes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> v2: Improve wording. [Eric]
> ---
> qemu-img.texi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options
2017-08-04 14:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options Fam Zheng
2017-08-04 14:42 ` Eric Blake
@ 2017-08-04 15:14 ` Jeff Cody
2017-08-08 10:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Cody @ 2017-08-04 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fam Zheng; +Cc: qemu-devel, Kevin Wolf, qemu-block, Max Reitz
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:36:58PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> It's not too surprising when a user specifies the backing file relative
> to the current working directory instead of the top layer image. This
> causes error when they differ. Though the error message has enough
> information to infer the fact about the misunderstanding, it is better
> if we document this explicitly, so that users don't have to learn from
> mistakes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> v2: Improve wording. [Eric]
> ---
> qemu-img.texi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-img.texi b/qemu-img.texi
> index 72dabd6b3e..90c7eab4a8 100644
> --- a/qemu-img.texi
> +++ b/qemu-img.texi
> @@ -244,6 +244,9 @@ only the differences from @var{backing_file}. No size needs to be specified in
> this case. @var{backing_file} will never be modified unless you use the
> @code{commit} monitor command (or qemu-img commit).
>
> +If a relative path name is given, the backing file is looked up relative to
> +the directory containing @var{filename}.
> +
> Note that a given backing file will be opened to check that it is valid. Use
> the @code{-u} option to enable unsafe backing file mode, which means that the
> image will be created even if the associated backing file cannot be opened. A
> @@ -343,6 +346,9 @@ created as a copy on write image of the specified base image; the
> @var{backing_file} should have the same content as the input's base image,
> however the path, image format, etc may differ.
>
> +If a relative path name is given, the backing file is looked up relative to
> +the directory containing @var{output_filename}.
> +
> If the @code{-n} option is specified, the target volume creation will be
> skipped. This is useful for formats such as @code{rbd} if the target
> volume has already been created with site specific options that cannot
> @@ -490,6 +496,9 @@ The backing file is changed to @var{backing_file} and (if the image format of
> string), then the image is rebased onto no backing file (i.e. it will exist
> independently of any backing file).
>
> +If a relative path name is given, the backing file is looked up relative to
> +the directory containing @var{filename}.
> +
> @var{cache} specifies the cache mode to be used for @var{filename}, whereas
> @var{src_cache} specifies the cache mode for reading backing files.
>
> --
> 2.13.3
>
>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options
2017-08-04 14:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options Fam Zheng
2017-08-04 14:42 ` Eric Blake
2017-08-04 15:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Jeff Cody
@ 2017-08-08 10:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-08-31 6:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Fam Zheng
2017-09-07 15:11 ` Kevin Wolf
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2017-08-08 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fam Zheng; +Cc: qemu-devel, Kevin Wolf, qemu-block, Max Reitz
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 660 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:36:58PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> It's not too surprising when a user specifies the backing file relative
> to the current working directory instead of the top layer image. This
> causes error when they differ. Though the error message has enough
> information to infer the fact about the misunderstanding, it is better
> if we document this explicitly, so that users don't have to learn from
> mistakes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> v2: Improve wording. [Eric]
> ---
> qemu-img.texi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options
2017-08-04 14:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options Fam Zheng
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-08-08 10:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2017-08-31 6:52 ` Fam Zheng
2017-09-07 15:11 ` Kevin Wolf
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fam Zheng @ 2017-08-31 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, qemu-block, Max Reitz
On Fri, 08/04 22:36, Fam Zheng wrote:
> It's not too surprising when a user specifies the backing file relative
> to the current working directory instead of the top layer image. This
> causes error when they differ. Though the error message has enough
> information to infer the fact about the misunderstanding, it is better
> if we document this explicitly, so that users don't have to learn from
> mistakes.
Gentle ping as a reminder for 2.11, as 2.10 is now out of door.
Fam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options
2017-08-04 14:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Clarify about relative backing file options Fam Zheng
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-08-31 6:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Fam Zheng
@ 2017-09-07 15:11 ` Kevin Wolf
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Wolf @ 2017-09-07 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fam Zheng; +Cc: qemu-devel, Eric Blake, Max Reitz, qemu-block
Am 04.08.2017 um 16:36 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> It's not too surprising when a user specifies the backing file relative
> to the current working directory instead of the top layer image. This
> causes error when they differ. Though the error message has enough
> information to infer the fact about the misunderstanding, it is better
> if we document this explicitly, so that users don't have to learn from
> mistakes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Thanks, applied to the block branch.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread