From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"open list:Block layer core" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iotests: Fix expected whitespace for 185
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:57:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d789c6b-1313-89b2-20cf-da46feb147e5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c0fc5aa-d7a9-728c-24a8-e0aafc5a791c@virtuozzo.com>
On 2/2/21 2:03 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 02.02.2021 21:59, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Commit f93e19fb03b adjusted various iotest whitespace discrepancies,
>> but missed a test that is not part of default 'make check'.
>
>
> Actually, at point of f93e19fb03b there is no x-perf at all, so it's not
> a miss in f93e19fb03b...
>
> Let me bisect it...
>
> Hmm, seems, it's wrong since introducing this line in 61623f82153788e
>
> Why was it wrongly added - it's a question.. Looks like something was
> merged in a meantime, that changed how qmp log looks like.. And original
> patch was made before that. But I don't want to dig more :)
Okay, I'll adjust my commit message; we definitely had a case of patches
crossing one another, reintroducing the problem.
>
> for the patch itself:
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Thanks; I'll include it in my NBD pull request, since I found it while
using iotests for that.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-02 18:59 [PATCH] iotests: Fix expected whitespace for 185 Eric Blake
2021-02-02 20:03 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 20:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-02 20:57 ` Eric Blake [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d789c6b-1313-89b2-20cf-da46feb147e5@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).