qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:08:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dadfe48-d92f-4a54-1590-3aa4b5fbc1aa@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97db1c4b-bc9e-9db0-424d-6cd3ba348e78@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3190 bytes --]

On 11/29/19 1:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 29/11/2019 10.47, Janosch Frank wrote:
> [...]
>> Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
>> 3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.
> 
> So if 8-10 are not valid in protected mode...
> 
>> @@ -59,6 +61,9 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
>>  #define DIAG308_LOAD_NORMAL_DUMP    4
>>  #define DIAG308_SET                 5
>>  #define DIAG308_STORE               6
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_SET              8
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_STORE            9
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_START            10
>>  
>>  static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
>>                                uintptr_t ra, bool write)
>> @@ -105,6 +110,7 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>>          s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_REIPL);
>>          break;
>>      case DIAG308_SET:
>> +    case DIAG308_PV_SET:
> 
> ... should you maybe add a check here (and the other cases) to make sure
> that the guest is currently not running in PV mode? Or is this taken
> care of by the Ultravisor already?

The Ultravisor takes care of that.

> 
>>          if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, false)) {
>>              return;
>>          }
>> @@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>>  
>>          cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>>  
>> -        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb)) {
>> +        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
>> +            !(iplb_valid_se(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_comp(iplb) >= 0)) {
>>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
>>              goto out;
>>          }
>> @@ -128,10 +135,15 @@ out:
>>          g_free(iplb);
>>          return;
>>      case DIAG308_STORE:
>> +    case DIAG308_PV_STORE:
>>          if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
>>              return;
>>          }
>> -        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
>> +        if (subcode == DIAG308_PV_STORE) {
>> +            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
>> +        } else {
>> +            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
>> +        }
>>          if (iplb) {
>>              cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
>> @@ -139,6 +151,16 @@ out:
>>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
>>          }
>>          return;
>> +        break;
> 
> Please remove the break. Or the return. But let's not do both.

Right, I forgot to remove that...

> 
>> +    case DIAG308_PV_START:
>> +        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
>> +        if (!iplb_valid_se(iplb)) {
>> +            env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF;
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_PV);
>> +        break;
>>      default:
>>          s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
>>          break;
>>
> 
>  Thomas
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29  9:47 [PATCH v2 00/13] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:18     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:41       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 12:40   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 14:08     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-12-02  9:20       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] Header sync protvirt Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 10:48   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:32     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-04 11:34       ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:46         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] s390x: protvirt: Add pv state to cpu env Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:22     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:50     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-05 17:15   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-05 17:34     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-05 17:46       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  7:44         ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  8:29           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  8:45             ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:08               ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  9:30                 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:15     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:21     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:24       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 11:58   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 12:44     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] s390x: Exit on vcpu reset error Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 12:16   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-05 17:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:04   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 11:08     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0dadfe48-d92f-4a54-1590-3aa4b5fbc1aa@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).