From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] block: Add @exact parameter to bdrv_co_truncate()
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:10:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dbdc19b-c740-92e1-4ee7-294d3d7581e1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190918095144.955-1-mreitz@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1846 bytes --]
On 18.09.19 11:51, Max Reitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series is supposed to pull out some of the problems from my
> “Generic file creation fallback” series.
>
> The blk_truncate_for_formatting() function added there was buggy, as
> Maxim noted, in that it did not check whether blk_truncate() actually
> resized the block node to the target offset. One way to fix this is to
> add a parameter to it that forces the block driver to do so, and that is
> done by this series.
>
> I think this is generally useful (you can see the diff stat saldo is
> only +23 lines), because it allows us to drop a special check in
> qemu-img resize, and it fixes a bug in qed (which has relied on this
> behavior for over 8 years, but unfortunately bdrv_truncate()’s behavior
> changed quite exactly 8 years ago).
>
> However, in the process I noticed we actually don’t need
> blk_truncate_for_formatting(): The underlying problem is that some
> format drivers truncate their underlying file node to 0 before
> formatting it to drop all data. So they should pass exact=true, but
> they cannot, because this would break creation on block devices. Hence
> blk_truncate_for_formatting().
>
> It turns out, though, that three of the four drivers in question don’t
> need to truncate their file node at all. The remaining one is qed which
> simply really should pass exact=true (it’s a bug fix).
>
> (I do drop those blk_truncate() invocations in this series, because
> otherwise I feel like it is impossible to decide whether they should get
> exact=false or exact=true. Either way is wrong.)
Thanks for the review, I’ve applied the series to my block branch and
changed the comment in qed.c as requested and suggested by Maxim on patch 7:
https://git.xanclic.moe/XanClic/qemu/commits/branch/block
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-18 9:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] block: Add @exact parameter to bdrv_co_truncate() Max Reitz
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] block: Handle filter truncation like native impl Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:49 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] block/cor: Drop cor_co_truncate() Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:49 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] block: Do not truncate file node when formatting Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:50 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] block: Add @exact parameter to bdrv_co_truncate() Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:50 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-28 11:05 ` Max Reitz
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] block: Evaluate @exact in protocol drivers Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] block: Let format drivers pass @exact Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] block: Pass truncate exact=true where reasonable Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:52 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-28 11:08 ` Max Reitz
2019-09-18 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] Revert "qemu-img: Check post-truncation size" Max Reitz
2019-09-18 20:52 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-28 11:10 ` Max Reitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0dbdc19b-c740-92e1-4ee7-294d3d7581e1@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).